Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Supreme Court Issues and Opinions - 9:30am EDT (SCOTUS Blog to start at 9am) 6-25-15
SCoTUS Blog ^

Posted on 06/25/2015 3:41:45 AM PDT by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-207 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Decision of the Fourth Circuit is affirmed in King v. Burwell. 6-3.

America is Grubered (again).

181 posted on 06/25/2015 9:01:17 AM PDT by CDB (trans-political--"blue" GOPe'rs trapped inside a "red" constiuency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: dware

I think you’ll like what I have in mind for Conservatism without Ballots.


182 posted on 06/25/2015 9:06:51 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I thought the three branches were Larry, Curley, and Moe!

Dang those civics classes in public high school. Got it wrong again.


183 posted on 06/25/2015 9:09:05 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Principled

For what good purpose do we invent a new term? Holy matrimony is the perfectly succinct term for faith based marriages (the sacrament). Civil unions are reserved for those that don’t care to have their wedding be a sacrament (ordained by Caesar vs. by God).


184 posted on 06/25/2015 9:13:48 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

It is no longer the Supreme Court. It is the EXTREME Court!


185 posted on 06/25/2015 9:23:00 AM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1
For what good purpose do we invent a new term?

To prevent the homosexuals from using the law to equate their version with ours.

186 posted on 06/25/2015 9:24:24 AM PDT by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Principled

It is only equal in the minds of those that do not share the proper context. After a point it doesn’t matter what homosexuals think or say - that simply does not change facts.

Words mean things. Using doublespeak to attempt to change the meaning of a word only works if we let it.


187 posted on 06/25/2015 9:32:52 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

What are you even talking about?

I’m saying i’d like to have States use words that have meaning to us wrt marriage and God but that will not be accepted by the homosexuals. I _think_ you’re saying not to?


188 posted on 06/25/2015 9:39:44 AM PDT by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Roberts needs to be impeached for treason. He has intentionally voted against the constitution and is making law from the bench.

I pray Psalms 109:8-9 over all democrats and all rinos. May God have justice on their souls quickly.


189 posted on 06/25/2015 10:21:56 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: John O

Roberts has to live or die by the money he got/gets for selling out the US which he then can transfer into the Bank of the Vatican like he was caught doing after his first sell out of US on Obama care.


190 posted on 06/25/2015 10:30:59 AM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2

Could you expand on that?


191 posted on 06/25/2015 10:31:58 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: John O

“Roberts needs to be impeached for treason”

Well, let’s check the scoreboard:

Antonin Scalia........ ... ...Reagan OUTSTANDING
Anthony Kennedy.............Reagan Eech/all over the place
Clarence Thomas....... ....GHWBush..OUTSTANDING
Ruth Bader Ginsburg.........Clinton.. Complete Zero
Stephen Breyer..............Clinton Complete Zero
Samuel Alito.... ... .. ....GWBush...OUTSTANDING
John G. Roberts, Jr.........GWBush Complete Zero
Sonia Sotomayor...... ......Obama....Complete Zero
Elena Kagan........... ......Obama . Complete Zero

So for 20 years of Republican Presidents, each has only managed to appoint one superior judge. And of course all of the ones put in by democraps have been jokes. Doesn’t give you a warm feeling will with ever have a Supreme Court without its head clearly inserted into its neither regions, does it?


192 posted on 06/25/2015 10:48:41 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Principled

I am saying the language used currently already does that (that there is no need to change anything).

Holy Matrimony = those marriages that are performed by the church, sanctified by it and are the actual sacrament.

Civil unions = marriage certificate issued by the state where the state recognizes the marriage for tax and other legal purposes.

Some churches are starting to practice not signing marriage certificates (not performing the role as witness) and forcing couples to get that done by a JP if they want their marriage recognized by the state/fed gov. This causes homosexual marriage (civil union) seekers to go elsewhere to get what they immediately want, which is state and federal sanctioning of their marriage.

Everyone with a few brain cells to rub together will, in retrospect, see that the push is broader than just state acceptance (indoctrination and forced acceptance of the lifestyle), but at least the church isn’t forced to go against doctrine.


193 posted on 06/25/2015 11:05:18 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

As of June 24, 2015, the total number of Obama Article III judgeship nominees to be confirmed by the United States Senate is 311, including two justices to the Supreme Court of the United States, 53 judges to the United States Courts of Appeals, 254 judges to the United States district courts, and two judges to the United States Court of International Trade. The number of nominations currently awaiting Senate action is 18. There are currently 9 vacancies on the United States Courts of Appeals, 45 vacancies on the United States district courts, 4 vacancies on the United States Court of International Trade and 22 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Obama’s second term. Obama has not made any recess appointments to the federal courts.

213 Obama judges were confirmed without a challenge, 180 to the District Courts and 31 to various U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals.

That includes Obama federal judges who were confirmed either unanimously or by unanimous consent and also Obama federal judges who were confirmed on a voice vote.


194 posted on 06/25/2015 11:36:23 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

I mean that just because time has gone by doesn’t mean something CAN’T be repealed. The current crop, as I’ve posted many times on threads here today, WANTS this USSC decision as cover so they can pretend they are “trying to repeal it” but where they are just campaigning on that phrase.


195 posted on 06/25/2015 12:23:50 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady

Jim Jordan is not a part of the GOPe. I wish he was my Congressman. Jeff Sessions is not a part of the GOPe.


196 posted on 06/25/2015 12:25:02 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Blackyce

I completely understand that. That’s not what is at issue. What is at issue is that the GOPe can now “campaign” against Obamacare (”we’ll repeal and replace,” which is the stupid phrase) and make base voters think they’re serious, while it’s clear to their donors they aren’t doing any such thing. They get the best of both worlds.


197 posted on 06/25/2015 12:26:27 PM PDT by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1; Principled

I don’t get this. Marriage, i.e. the covenant between a man and woman in the religious sense is vastly different from the “marriage” license issued by caesar and the center of the controversy.

Caesar can put whatever restrictions he does or doesn’t want on his license. He can sell it to whomever he wants. It doesn’t change what marriage means in the religious sense.

Unfortunately churches have been unwittingly complicit here: they agree to execute the license issued by caesar and end up following his warped interpretation of what it means. So why do churches continue to be the unpaid executor of these licenses?

There is a solution to this for the churches: stop executing the “marriage” licenses. The religious marriage ceremony itself doesn’t require it. Churches can and have married people without a license. For thousands of years. Its perfectly legal, and although it won’t be an official state approved “marriage,” are the churches really that interested in keeping family law courts and attorneys in business by executing caesars “marriage” licenses?

To summarize, if you volunteer to be caesar’s agent, you’ll be expected to follow caesar’s rules.


198 posted on 06/25/2015 1:36:40 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat ( The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves and fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

You are echoing my sentiments on the subject quite well.


199 posted on 06/25/2015 2:23:36 PM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“If the ChiComs call our loan”
You mean quit buying Treasuries? Well, our rates would have to go up considerably to attract other buyers. And we couldn’t afford to pay higher rates.

When we can’t buy China’s products US investors there will have to sell their assets for pennies to the Chinese State.
China won’t even have to nationalize, it’ll just be ‘bad luck’.


200 posted on 06/25/2015 4:41:35 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson