So to reiterate what I posted weeks ago, the sequence is this:
1) police arrive in response to disturbance.
2) disturbance begins.
3) police riflemen shoot and kill anywhere from 6 to 8 people injuring a score who survive.
Anyone besides me see something wrong here?
“3) police riflemen shoot and kill anywhere from 6 to 8 people injuring a score who survive. Anyone besides me see something wrong here?”
Yes.
1. You state a minimum of 26 shot by police but police only shot 12 rounds.
2. Numerous bikers and family members praise the job the police did.
Peter Graves, Bandidos officer, says they respect the police for doing their job.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_sCRg69TQE
(Big John Snyder, Vice president of the Boozefighters) “The police were professional, considering the situation they were in. They were professional and doing their job,” he said.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-waco-biker-20150519-story.html
We have also heard from a biker family member that the police probably saved lives at Waco.
1) police arrive leave their parked vehicles in response to disturbance.
(They were already there in numbers according to Chief of Police Brent Stroman.)
“1) police arrive in response to disturbance.
2) disturbance begins.
3) police riflemen shoot and kill anywhere from 6 to 8 people injuring a score who survive.
Anyone besides me see something wrong here?”
You have the disturbance beginning after the police arrive in response to the disturbance!
Re your point 1...
I am fairly sure the police were there *prior* to the disturbance, in large numbers.
The police presence in the pictures after the shooting indicate (not prove) that there may have been undercover police at the scene *prior* to the shooting.
The potential exists for the police to have been involved in the initial disturbance.