To: 4rcane
It was bad enough that he think OBama could be trusted to negotiable a trade deal
You really believe what you just posted?
TPA was there EXACTLY because Cruz does not trust Obama to negotiate a trade deal without throwing everything in it that should not be there.
17 posted on
06/23/2015 5:58:20 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
I always liked kool-aid as a kid.
20 posted on
06/23/2015 5:59:33 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: SoConPubbie
Unfortunately, the “leadership” in Congress attempted to gut TPA so that it wouldn’t do anything like that. Which, I suppose, is why Cruz is voting against it now.
All this drama is giving me a headache. On the one hand, I don’t want to trust politicians. On the other hand, Cruz has so far shown himself to be a man of principle, and I think that he’s so far earned the benefit of the doubt.
25 posted on
06/23/2015 6:02:23 PM PDT by
Luircin
To: SoConPubbie
>>>>> TPA was there EXACTLY because Cruz does not trust Obama to negotiate a trade deal without throwing everything in it that should not be there.<<<<<
If TPA controls 0bama better than no TPA, why did Cruz vote against TPA?
30 posted on
06/23/2015 6:05:52 PM PDT by
Principled
(Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson