Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz Now a ‘No’ on TPA Read more at:
National Review Online - The Corner ^ | June 23, 2015 10:24 AM | Andrew C. McCarthy

Posted on 06/23/2015 5:43:39 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-205 next last
To: odawg
That is according to what your boy Cruz just told a few million people. He said that the TPA DOES NOT have any prohibitive immigration language in it. Can I repeat what he said: He and Senator Sessions failed to get a clause inserted that would prohibit any changes in U.S. immigration law forever in TPA. Gowdy said that it did. Get snotty with them.

And I am so sure that that proves that Gowdy lied.

Must be great having the Powers of God to read the hearts of men and determine their motive.
81 posted on 06/23/2015 7:09:07 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Reagan would not have given Obama more power?

Prove it, Toast Diogensis


82 posted on 06/23/2015 7:09:36 PM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Do you consider NAFTA to have been “free market” trading?

It had a lot of free market elements, among them the elimination of tariffs. I don't think anyone can argue that that's not in the direction of free markets.

Free markets don't come without costs, however, which I'm happy to acknowledge.

83 posted on 06/23/2015 7:10:37 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The Cruz Derangement Syndrome (CDS) is on par with Palin Derangement Syndrome (PDS)

That means President Cruz is inevitable.


84 posted on 06/23/2015 7:11:44 PM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MN_Mike
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream.
It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same,
or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children
and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.
"
President Ronald Reagan
85 posted on 06/23/2015 7:12:24 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis; MN_Mike
Ronald Reagan would NOT have given Obama more power, would NOT have spit in his voters' and supporters' faces, and would NOT have voted for something SECRET.

Think again Diogenesis. All TPA's and TPP's, Congressional Executive Trade Agreements, have gone through the same so-called "SECRET" negotiation process involved with TPP.

Since the Fast Tracked 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement revealed what really was at stake with the arcane Nixon-era procedure, getting any Congress to delegate years of blank-check Fast Track authority has been a very hard sell. Since 1988, only Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush persuaded Congress to grant the multi-year Fast Track delegation President Barack Obama seeks.

86 posted on 06/23/2015 7:13:16 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Nope, let me help you out:

(1) Did Reagan ever meet Obama? No


87 posted on 06/23/2015 7:13:24 PM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Colonel_Flagg; GodBlessUSA; All
Cruz Interview on Mark Levin
....on the Issue of TPA

88 posted on 06/23/2015 7:13:42 PM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris, Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL Vets, too!w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MN_Mike; Diogenesis
Reagan would not have given Obama more power?

Prove it, Toast Diogensis


Hey, I like that. Your new nickname courtesy of MN_MIKE:

"Toast" Diogensis
89 posted on 06/23/2015 7:14:33 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The Cruz detractors are desperate.

Which is hilarious.


90 posted on 06/23/2015 7:14:49 PM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Do you have a problem with reading?

1.) Gowdy WROTE that the TPA contained wording that prohibited the treaty being used to override U.S. immigration law.

2.) Cruz just said that it DOES NOT CONTAIN THAT LANGUAGE!

3.) I didn’t go into Gowdy’s motive; I just said that he lied. Can you justify another conclusion?


91 posted on 06/23/2015 7:14:52 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Lopeover

See post #88

Or several others. :)


92 posted on 06/23/2015 7:15:56 PM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris, Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL Vets, too!w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MN_Mike

Could Cruz have thrust a stake through the heart of the legislation had he opposed it sooner.


93 posted on 06/23/2015 7:16:26 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: odawg
3.) I didn’t go into Gowdy’s motive; I just said that he lied. Can you justify another conclusion?

??????

You can only lie, if you know the truth is something else.

Lying implies motivation.

Come on, you're smart than this.
94 posted on 06/23/2015 7:17:51 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

I don’t do hypotheticals.

Cruz explained his reasoning very well.

Revisit the Levin interview.


95 posted on 06/23/2015 7:21:42 PM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Did TPA pass the Senate last time by 1 vote?

Answer: No


96 posted on 06/23/2015 7:22:43 PM PDT by MN_Mike (Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; conservativegranny; ripnbang
He has a deadline to meet at the end of the month. There was a campaign push to fundraise the past couple of days. I received a letter. I’m guessing that what really happened was that the money wasn’t rolling in as fast. I’m sure he was getting a lot of negative feedback from supporters.

> "I am SOOOOOOO SURE that was the case."

> "I mean, if you look at his record, it is so chock-full of examples where he chose expedience over principle, right?"

> "I mean, if you really wanted to, you could post a lot of examples where Ted Cruz acted not from Principle, but simply out of selfishness and self-interest, right?"

According to the anti-Cruz trolls, Ted and Heidi are waiting for their big payday from Goldman-Sachs so why would they need donations from the 'little' people?

To conservativegranny, I also received the same email and it was not so much for money as it was for publicity. In fact here is exactly what was said:

Dear xxxxx,

Please keep an eye out . . .

. . . I overnighted you an urgent letter because your quick reply is critical to our campaign plan.

I cannot overstate the importance of you keeping an eye out for this confidential correspondence, Michael.

On June 30th, all presidential campaigns must file financial reports with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), detailing every single contribution and expenditures for the 2nd quarter.

Once the results are made public, all the media outlets – from the “mainstream” newspapers to influential conservative magazines and websites – will immediately access every single FEC report so they can run stories about how the presidential “horse race” is shaping up.

If we post strong fundraising numbers, we will get priceless media coverage and strengthen our position within the “Top Tier” of Republican campaigns, which will determine who holds the upper-hand heading into summer and the first primary debates.

The reporting deadline is June 30th, so please don’t delay. Please make your most generous gift of $25, $40, or $50 today.

For liberty,

So allow me to ask you conservativegranny, why would Ted Cruz' campaign team be OVERNIGHTING a letter if they needed money? The answer is IT'S not the money but the PUBLICITY. This is a campaign operation to buy favorable PUBLICITY.

97 posted on 06/23/2015 7:22:48 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: xzins

So what what’s your point? Did you even bother to read the TPA bill that was originally sent from the Senate to the House?

I did. I didn’t see one thing wrong with it and I read it carefully.

So again what’s your point?


98 posted on 06/23/2015 7:26:52 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Bttt


99 posted on 06/23/2015 7:27:05 PM PDT by Guenevere (If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do........Psalms 11:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“You can only lie, if you know the truth is something else.”

I think that when Cruz admitted the bill contained no immigration prohibition, he was telling the truth. Would that qualify as an answer to “if you know the truth is something else”? Cruz’s statement runs counter to what Gowdy wrote.


100 posted on 06/23/2015 7:28:44 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-205 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson