Posted on 06/21/2015 7:37:03 AM PDT by cotton1706
I’ll side with Rush on this....his assessment....which is that Rove was answering a question in the hypothetical from Wallace. Now, do I trust Rove on the Second Amendment? No. Would I have answered it the way Rove did? NO. Did Rush say he was okay with Rove on the Second Amendment? No, but he did make the point that this particular issue was being misrepresented a bit.
But the headline was over stated - which was my point , a valid tangental point. If you think hatred of Rove is more important than truth, that’s your right. I on the other hand prefer to really nail Rove on all the incidents where there is no mislead needed.
I have seen and heard too many people in government (even elected) who in private will admit they want the second repealed. Wallace was just parroting the DC sentiment.
oh yeah, I am sure about Wallace on that. He’s all DC elitist, period.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.