[Captain Rhino]

“That it is under reported, glossed over crimes against whites that is the real story that inspired an lone, at-the-fringe-of -society, drug addled, psycho to walk into that church and open fire on decent, innocent, law abiding black members of society.”

If he wanted to attack the criminal element really damaging this country, he needed to find a illegal drug open air market in Charleston and go in with pistol blazing. As a drug user himself, it would not have been hard for him to find one. However, the dealers are usually armed, so his little murder offensive would have immediately faced major push back and he would have just died in the street, like the dog he is. (Apologies to dogs everywhere.)

That is the real shame of his crime; he attacked the decent, innocent, and law abiding who had welcomed him into their midst in Christian friendship. His attack reflects his cowardice.

[RedMonqey]

That is the real shame of his crime; he attacked the decent, innocent, and law abiding who had welcomed him into their midst in Christian friendship. His attack reflects his cowardice.

In his very own words his states what every Gun rights supporter has been shouting from the rooftops, he choose a church where guns were prohibited by law(his first target was a college but it had security, i.e a person with a gun)

He barked about the worst elements of Black society but was too cowardly (he was "alone" in his own words was his excuse) to go where the real dregs of the community were and confront them.

Why?

Because they would armed and would fire back.

The exact argument pro 2nd amendment supports argue!