Your response repeats conclusionary language without support and which is internally inconsistent. You chide Mark Levin for not fulfilling a threat to withdraw from the Republican Party when he has made no such threat. He said he was an inch away, if your version is to be believed, he did not say he was withdrawing from the Republican Party. If he had said the latter and failed to do so you might have a point, but one at best limited persuasiveness.
It is hard to identify anyone in the pantheon of conservatives who are publicly known who would have been more strident in their attacks on Rino Republicans and who have lent their support to insurgents in the house, as noted in my original reply, and who has the land their airtime to insurgents seeking election in house and Senate.
I know of no pundit who has been more right on all the issues. He is right on trade, right on immigration, right on convention of the states, right on deficits and budgets, right on the war against terror, right on Obamacare, right on environmental tyranny, right on the meaning of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. I know of no issue on which he is "wrong."
His career demonstrates that he walks the walk as well as talks the talk. Mark Levin is not part of the problem is part of the solution. I suspect your antipathy stems from an unfounded fear of Article V.
