[SoFloFreeper]

A solid victory for religious and free speech....but....Alliance Defending Freedom really needs the support of more people.

They are the lawyers out defending Christian bakers, florists, and other believers against the wicked fascists who want to destroy speech.

[Lurking Libertarian]

This was a no-brainer of a case (hence the 9-0 decision).

[Boogieman]

“Today’s decision by the Supreme Court wreaks havoc on the ability of local governments to implement sign code regulations that are responsive to the needs of their communities,”

If your community’s needs violate the Constitution, then they don’t need to be responded to.

[PATRIOT1876]

Good for the Supreme Court!

I hope they tell Emperor Sheldon Whitehouse that he CANNOT steal our free speech rights!

[PetroniusMaximus]

I can’t believe the coven of the three witches agreed with this.

[Amendment10]

Beware!

Two wrongs don’t make a right. The Founding States never intended for our constitutional freedoms to be absolute. But as a consequence of widespread ignorance of 10th Amendment-protected state sovereignty, activist justices have been getting away with weakening state sovereignty since before the days of Constitution ignoring FDR.

Consider unconstitutional Obamacare for example. All that we’re hearing about in legal efforts to fight it is legal technicalities as opposed to unique, 10th Amendment-protect state power to regulate, tax and spend for intrastate healthcare purposes versus the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers.

So while it’s good the Court decided in favor of the church on this issue, the decision can also be regarded as another razor cut by the feds to destroy state sovereignty in the eyes of low-information citizens who have no idea what state sovereignty is.

[American Constitutionalist]

Now if we can some how apply this to the discrimination by the government on those who are conservatives, Republicans when the government went after those who oppose government policies by harrasing those people and intimidated those people with the IRS.

[American Constitutionalist]

Now if we can some how apply this to the discrimination by the government on those who are conservatives, Republicans when the government went after those who oppose government policies by harrasing those people and intimidated those people with the IRS.

[NonValueAdded]

9th circus reversed again.