Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

It was in a speech Cruz gave and I’m trying to determine which one. He said that he had conferred with Sessions on the Amendment to the Senate bill. That Amendment did not get voted on, but he said that the language would likely be included in the House bill, which is what happened.


79 posted on 06/19/2015 10:57:25 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: conservativejoy

That’s cheap—like Walker trying to claim he’s reformed on illegal immigration after talking with Sessions.


81 posted on 06/19/2015 11:31:10 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: conservativejoy
It goes to the Senate now and if passed as is will not contain any immigration language.

The House Passes the TPA, again
House leaders separated the TPA from the TAA this week by moving TPA into H.R. 2146, a bill about the retirement funds of federal law enforcement officers and firefighters. The old provisions of the bill were retained when TPA was added to the end of this bill. This combined bill now goes to the Senate. (In fact, it goes back to the Senate. H.R. 2146 had previous passed the House and the Senate, but the Senate passed it with a technical change — see our summary. Rather than concurring in the Senate’s technical change, the House added TPA.)

The Senate will now have to decide whether to approve the House’s addition of TPA to H.R. 2146. But this is a removal of TAA from the original package deal. Senate Democrats may balk, but they may not have the numbers to vote the bill down.

This is the second vote in the House on TPA. The last vote was on the Senate’s Trade Act, H.R. 1314, that combined TPA and TAA. Although House Democrats support TAA, they voted against it last week to tank the whole bill (see our previous coverage and full explanation of TPA, TAA, and TPP). By doing so, they gave House Republicans the opportunity to pass the TPA alone and risk losing the one part of the trade deal they supported.

83 posted on 06/19/2015 11:44:35 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: conservativejoy
Notice that the Cruz amendment didn't make it to

H.R.2146 either.

(13) to take into account conditions relating to religious freedom of any party to negotiations for a trade agreement with the United States.
(b) Principal trade negotiating objectives.

No (14) there either.

86 posted on 06/19/2015 11:55:36 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson