Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/15/2015 9:07:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Leftist Uber-rich people are such hypocrites. Just look at Hillary! trying to pretend she can relate to those struggling in this country.


2 posted on 06/15/2015 9:10:09 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Not my circus, not my monkeys.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
" Should California rich be able to use as much water as they can afford?"

Of course. And they should be able to use all the illegal aliens they can afford too! At 1.65 an hour.

3 posted on 06/15/2015 9:11:16 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

They could look to Israel’s successful desalination projects as an example, but that would be too logical. Maybe the bullet train is more important than fresh water.


4 posted on 06/15/2015 9:19:07 AM PDT by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"It’s now more of a ‘This is the amount of water you get within this billing period. And if you go over that, there will be high penalties.’ ”

Unless the penalties are more than just monetary they will never have an effect on the uber-rich in California.

5 posted on 06/15/2015 9:19:11 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes, and they should be able to terminate at least a dozen people they don’t like.

It’s only fair.


6 posted on 06/15/2015 9:26:32 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Sure, but since California also has a budget problem it might be equally proper to raise their water bill enough to offset that.

Just sayin’.


7 posted on 06/15/2015 10:18:22 AM PDT by oldfart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Sure, but since California also has a budget problem it might be equally proper to raise their water bill enough to offset that.

Just sayin’.


8 posted on 06/15/2015 10:18:35 AM PDT by oldfart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes. As long as they pay their Hydrogen offsets.


9 posted on 06/15/2015 10:23:08 AM PDT by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
causing most of the lawns and gardens in California to shrivel and die.

Because it's a damn DESERT!

10 posted on 06/15/2015 10:24:32 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; newgeezer
Should California rich be able to use as much water as they can afford?

Food
Gas
Healthcare

This is a classic conservative vs liberal question. It should be easy unless you consider that there are a whole different set of laws for the elite.

11 posted on 06/15/2015 10:26:33 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Of those born of women there is not risen one greater than John The Baptist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
No way! We have Politically Correct SHAMING ENFORCEMENT in CA!!!

Phhhhhhht!!!

13 posted on 06/15/2015 10:50:23 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Help Stamp Out Pernicious Progressives and Arrogant Activists With Their Liberalism!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Most of California’s fresh water is being dumped in the ocean. So this exercise is just another attack on the wealthy. Instead of using carbon, the left is now using water as the mode of attack. Unless rationing is instituted on what comes from civil sources, the wealthy are entitled to as much as they want to pay for.

It isn’t a matter of how much they pay or how much they use, it is a matter of availability. If the wealthy need this much water and rationing has been instituted, they can have water trucked in.

As long as it is cheaper to get the water out of a pipe than from a truck, the wealthy will get their water from a pipe.


14 posted on 06/15/2015 11:14:07 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Absolutely!


15 posted on 06/15/2015 2:06:14 PM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course. If you can pay for it, nobody should force you to not have it. What next? The wealthy get too much vacation and fun?


17 posted on 06/16/2015 6:37:44 AM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Ahhh....

For an equitable outcome, water should be rationed in the same proportion as taxes paid.

Those that pay lots of taxes get lots of water.

Those that pay no taxes get no water.

Those with an excess of taxes and thus water can sell the excess to those with none

Those with no water and no money can return to the land of plentiful water in Mexico


19 posted on 06/17/2015 11:12:30 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson