Replies

Thanks very much for the ping. I respect you and the company in the ping very much.

My own opinion, here, leaves out Jeff Sessions, although I agree with him on the alarm bells.

My problem with any of our candidates seen leading on this dog is that NO ONE truly wants to deal with a major piece of legislation under this president that some might say equals the magnitude of Obamacare and like Obamacare leaves Congress with no Advise whatsoever, but plenty of manipulated Consent, with but that blasted UP or DOWN vote on the whole, and well AFTER the fact of it.

Period.Period.

Never mind the sunny projections that the SCOTUS approves “fast track” as something that overturns no laws, and conjures it up with the thrilling tradition of George Washington.

So, with the authority of fast track in his hand, Obama shapes the subsequent agreement, has the authority to sign it, presents it to Congress, with some VITAL features, and some “necessary” TIME bomb, and with plenty of expected Obama shark hooks.

Will the Republican Congress buckle to the almost certain vital features that will be in it? How about an attached time bomb that is sure to be included with those VITAL features? After all, Obama is working with Boehner and McConnell, here, and rings their bell regularly with just a little pressure added. Like a time bomb.

Remember, there are NO ammendments, no horse trading, no discussion. Will Congress vote “YEA”, to salvage the vital and to “beat the clock”, or will they reject the catastrophic shark hooks Obama adds to it that further kill capitalism and independence, to vote “NO”???

Does anyone realize how agonized Congress will be tied in knots when this comes up and Congress is placed squarely in the Obama political vice, being squeezed to rupture?

Politically the trade agreement guarantees Howard and Pivens chaos to keep up the divisiveness for another year and a half, damages voter turn out for Republicans and blows one more election.

We’re getting worked over, I’m afraid. Trust is not an issue with these players or they would scuttle this bright idea and wait to work this out after the election with Republican majorities in both houses (hopefully). Obviously, to me, this looks like UniParty activity from top to bottom.

Putting lipstick on this piglet doesn’t overcome the objection of this president being in charge of it for a year and a half. That concern will not go away easily for me, or just because some favored candidate likes this monster.

Somebody, coax me off the ledge.