To: VitacoreVision
Creating jobs by eliminating jobs?
2 posted on
06/14/2015 10:01:30 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Claire Wolfe should check her watch. It's time.)
To: VitacoreVision
Oh, the irony, from these Transnational Progressivists!
And we still have pro-ObamaTrade Cruzbots shilling for him and the destruction of America here on the Free Republic.
Un-friggin-believable!
3 posted on
06/14/2015 10:04:47 AM PDT by
WIBamian
(I will not be abused by liars.)
To: VitacoreVision
If it creates an even larger idle class when manufacturing jobs are shipped overseas, it will add to the domestic problems we have. Everything in DC about trade should be on "time out" until some of those already existing trade deals are fixed or repealed.
The paradox in this bill in itself should've been enough for everyone to vote against it.
4 posted on
06/14/2015 10:05:46 AM PDT by
grania
To: VitacoreVision
Great piece from C. Mitchell Shaw.
It has been said that in America we have the stupid party and the evil party. Sometimes they get together and do something both stupid and evil. This, we call bipartisanship.
5 posted on
06/14/2015 10:08:20 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: VitacoreVision
Obama Trade = the real Capitalist Pigs.
6 posted on
06/14/2015 10:08:27 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: VitacoreVision
Why are none of the news folks asking the Congress-critter of the day:"Why do you support this (process/agreement etc) when 2/3's of your constituents are opposed to it"?>p>http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/10/poll-majority-of-americans-oppose-obamas-trade-agreement-hurts-american-workers/
In what is left of the industrial cities, the number of surely smaller.
According to the Congressional Research Service 3.5 million MANUFACTURING jobs were lost in the US as a result of NAFTA alone.
Why is this data never cited?
Does ANYONE, on this forum or anywhere believe the US benefited to an extent that mitigates the loss of 3.5 million manufacturing jobs?
If so, make you case.
7 posted on
06/14/2015 10:12:15 AM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
To: VitacoreVision
Displaced American workers proves this Obamatrade deal is not in
America’s interest.
More welfare for American workers is not a good deal.
It is a bad idea.
9 posted on
06/14/2015 10:14:56 AM PDT by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
To: VitacoreVision
TAA was an attempt to pacify big labor that failed. That’s all.
10 posted on
06/14/2015 10:16:13 AM PDT by
bkepley
To: VitacoreVision
everyone goes on ObamaWelfare ?
12 posted on
06/14/2015 10:19:19 AM PDT by
molson209
(Blank)
To: VitacoreVision
You have to lose jobs before you can get jobs. LOL! They think we are all as stupid as dogs.
13 posted on
06/14/2015 10:28:35 AM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: VitacoreVision
Brilliant article. Thanks for posting.
15 posted on
06/14/2015 10:41:56 AM PDT by
kabar
To: VitacoreVision
What I recall from the wave of eliminating manufacturing jobs was that those displaced workers would be retrained in high-tech jobs, like IT workers.
Now they’re increasing the number of H1-B visas, to help eliminate the jobs of those high tech workers. I wonder what new careers the IT workers at Disney will be re-trained to do... Maybe to wear the Mickey & Minnie costumes in the Disney parks for minimum wage...
Mark
19 posted on
06/14/2015 11:21:55 AM PDT by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
To: VitacoreVision
Proponents of these agreements know they’re lying about job creation. Earlier agreements back to NAFTA, and probably before, have contained worker retraining programs and displacement programs.
21 posted on
06/14/2015 11:35:14 AM PDT by
Will88
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson