I believe it was Scalia, who questioned the plaintiff’s lawyer, as to what would happen to churches who would deny what the SCOTUS might rule is a “civil right.” The layer was very vague about the fallout.
And let’s not forget Hillary!’s statement that religions may HAVE to change, based on what the government demands.
Don’t forget that totalitarians often alert the masses to what their plans are, but those alerts are usually ignored.
Mark
“And let’s not forget Hillary’s statement that religions may have to change based on government demands.”
Of course I’m sure she has an exemption somewhere in there, for Islam.