“Okay, so that’s adequate to you? Other than that, if there is no prosecution, you feel that what Josh did to make amends is sufficient, and you personally forgive him and accept him in society?”
Josh has made his own decisions.
He made the decision to fondle his sisters.
He made the decision to become a public figure.
The public will now and for the rest of Josh”s life make decisions about if Josh should be accepted in society.
As an individual, I do not determine who is accepted into society.
But add an individual, you she do feel the necessity to damn, over and over and over again, someone who did wrong. Isn't "society" made up of individuals? So if everyone was like you, there would be constant damnation but no relief? No one should have to say when any punishment or rehabilitation was enough, but everyone should be able to persecute forever?
What, exactly, is the goal of such an approach?