Conservative National Review magazine goes homo

Fellowship Of The Minds ^ | Dr. Eowyn

[zeestephen]

Re: “Rich Lowry not all that Conservative either.”

I gave up on Lowry and NR Online around 2006.

Lowry was openly sympathetic to the Bush-McCain Amnesty, and to man-made global warming, and he hired a “new breed” of young Conservatives like “Crunchy Con” environmentalist Rod Dreher and future New York Times and Washington Post “Conservatives” like Ross Douthat and Robert Costa.

[Stosh]

That would be correct - he’s one of their lead writers.

[EDINVA]

Didn’t Ann Coulter long ago refer to the NRO guys as “girly men?” She was being polite (how unlike her!)

[miss marmelstein]

She may very well have. Lot of them out there. I just looked out the window and saw my neighbor throw the most girly-man pitch I ever seen. As bad as Obama’s.

[DiogenesLamp]

Let me setup hidden video cameras in a home where a homosexual couple have children for a month and another in a gay bar I will show the public what they are all about with plenty of footage to prove it. They are constantly prowling looking for sex. If the public knew about all of the other practices they engage in to find homo sex they'd be disgusted. Gay bars, gloryholes, bath houses, foot tapping in bathrooms, hanging out in places where they can find teens to approach them for sex (same online where they pretend to be females), going to parks and parking in their cars where they have "signals" they use to indicate they want to have sex, etc...they are much more filthy and disgusting creatures than the piblic is aware of...i was exposed to this crap while working as LEO. You talk to any beat cop that works any are where there are homo communities and you will hear the same stuff. They have a whole side of their life devoted to finding gay sex and they ate not normal and definitely not "Gay O.K." (talk anout some naive and easily fooled kids; they have no clue what they are talking about; they were just chanting BS; I'm sure their mothers will love it when they announce they are lesbians)

And why is the public misinformed about the nature of homosexuals? Because the entire might of the Liberal propaganda weapon has been deliberately misinforming them about the true nature of homosexuals.

They keep showing these non-threatening, likeable characters on television who don't do any of that sick stuff, and who are amusing and entertaining.

In other words, they show a false picture of the norm, because this is what they MUST show to fool the public.

Much of our current troubles stems from the fact that the Liberals feed misinformation into our news and entertainment streams. They have a monopoly on access to the public while at the same time, conservative voices are deliberately censored.

The only ones allowed on the air are the pet conservatives they can count on not to say anything too objectionable.

[DiogenesLamp]

Second, Steorts is the managing editor, and even though his is not the "official" editorial position of the publication, airing his view in a public forum using NRO goes a long way in explaining why he felt he had to call Mark Steyn into the street 15 months ago for retelling a very weak, old Bob Hope joke that Steyn used as a segue to launch his scathing attack the Gaystapo.

With this I agree. I don't want to be reading pro-Nazi arguments in a Jewish magazine, and I don't want to be reading any pro-homosexual arguments in a conservative magazine.

[Psalm 73]

"...put a little more thought into what you're responding to before you sling around your silly little mini-tirades."

Hmmm - "mini-tirade"?
I agreed with you that we don't know much about JL Steorts, then mentioned he was the reason Steyn was kicked off NR.
You take exception that I think Steyn is more rational than Steorts?
If so, still doesn't make my reply a "slinging of a mini-tirade".

Note to self: don't engage Will88 in light banter.

[Kickass Conservative]

Can’t have Homosexual Marriage without having Incestuous Marriage and Polygamous Marriage, period.

It’s all or nothing.

[Will88]

(If you didn't quickly say Mark Steyn, you maybe should be on the DU site....)

That smart-assed nonsense is not light banter, but some line you were just waiting for a chance to use. Maybe you belong at DU.

And my main point was precisely that we know next to nothing about Steorts and you went off on a tangent.

On a thread several days ago I made the point that Steorts was so obscure, he didn't even have a Wiki page. But someone his since added one and now folks can learn all about him.

Jason Steorts - Wiki

[Fightin Whitey]

Outspoken public homosexual Andrew Sullivan admits that gay marriage does NOT mean monogamy. As Sullivan puts it: “there is more likely to be greater understanding of the need for extramarital outlets between two men than between a man and a woman.”

So the whole rationale for fag marriage is a sham, even in the words of their gayru Andrew Sullivan.

And the unpleasant fact of the matter is that a fag, unlike a woman, can never get enough frequency or variety of gobbling penis and/or fornicating anus.

Boy Andrew ought to open a chain of child psychology clinics in order to explain that to the children they adopt.

[HomerBohn]

Homosexual marriage is like getting your degree from a mill, then proudly posting it on your wall. It doesn’t mean a damned thing!