So the possibility of a pro-choice Rand Paul being president does not portend much difference.
When a sizable majority of the American public decides that legal abortion must end, it will end, regardless of who is president. We are not there yet.
That is a typical Paul fan response, inaccurate and in support of abortion.
The single most important person in America when it comes to abortion, is the president, it is the public stage to sell life, or abortion, or indifference to the public, and he most controls federal policy on abortion.
Reagan and Bush saved lives as Presidents, Clinton and Obama killed people.
That's a lie. GWB directed federal funding for "stem research" or medical/scientific cannibalism of aborted babies. This was days before 9/11.
No one takes the shedding of innocent blood as seriously as God does. We can sit around our whole lives and argue about how "pro-life" each candidate is but the truth is that we have not yet seen a man who will sacrifice an iota of power or prestige much less go to war to stop it.
Murder was the absolutely shameless, top plank, front and center, highest priority ever single day, hour and minute of the last Democrat National Convention. At least Rand Paul pointed this out when he called out Elizabeth Warren on the life of a seven pound unborn baby. And she totally owned it. She smashed that baby out of the park and it seems like nobody even batted an eye much less cleared the bench and fed her to the dogs like the insane murdering Jezebel she is.
I take it your suggestion is that we stop vetting our candidates on the 55,000,000 human lives that have been sacrificed to legalized abortion on demand since 1973 until the rest of the nation comes around?
Sorry that position is incompatible with conservative politics.
And, as with many inconvenient political issues, Rand Paul is lying about this one.