Posted on 06/04/2015 4:07:21 PM PDT by presidio9
You really don’t like Paul being pointed out as pro-choice do you?
I think we have been down this road before, with you always arguing for Paul.
When a pro-choice liberal hits a note that you like, you don’t have to become so protective of him, as though you support him as a candidate.
Thank you for your clarity in posting. Agree 100%
Yeah, like every square inch of it, never to be inhabited again due to excessive radiation levels.
I’ve discovered the futility of arguing with someone who just makes stuff up.
That said, the NSA was lurching toward tyranny. Aren’t you glad Rand Paul stood up on this one even if it was the broken clock syndrome?
The NSA existed pre 911. It didn’t stop the attack. It’s powers were then broadened. Since then the NSA did not stop the Ft. Hood massacre. The NSA did not stop the Boston Bombing; and the Russians had even provided a heads up about those terrorists. Providing more and more unconstitutional power to an agency with a questionable track record has not been effective by any objective measure.
Thanks, gadget, for your kind words. If a government can on a whim rifle through its citizens’ affairs and papers, then that government is deadly and tyrannical.
Don’t lie, I made up nothing.
Every time I criticize Paul to you for being pro-choice, it becomes a fight, and it has been that way going back to 2014.
Like I said, futile to debate with those who make stuff up, taking things out of context, engaging in faulty logic and analysis, and turning to ad hominem argumentation.
I’ve learned my lesson. Go find someone else to troll.
God bless and keep you, dearest xzins!!!
Tell me what was made up, and I will show that you are lying, or “making it up” as you say.
troll
Thanks, onyx. Hope all was well with you today.
I’m all right. Thanks so much for asking.
Time to abandon this thread! It’s gone off topic, as usual.
Pointing out the problems with Rand Paul, is not trolling, but attacking people when do, is just weird.
You do know that he is pro-choice don’t you and wants us to drop the gay marriage issue? Did you also know that he wants to reduce our already undersized military and cut their budget?
No, It's still about Rand Paul and his candidacy, and his dark/evil side.
you truly are an argumentative, spiteful little troll
I looked at just your posts today: divisive, spiteful, arrogant.
Today’s posts are typical of his daily posts.
You just happened to draw his attention this evening.
Lucky you. /s
Another hatchet job by the kneepad media. I guess junior got some folks panties in a bunch.
One point from the article was really rich. Have you ever noticed that this so-called “tension” between security nterests and liberty always results in more surveillance over time, not less? The only “tension” is how much more monitoring the kleptocrats think they can get away with.
You think your posts are sweet?
Read your post.
Why would pointing out that a liberal weak candidate is pro-choice, so upset you?
I don’t like Paul, he is anti life, anti-marriage, anti-military, and anti-conservative, and evidently you don’t want any of that mentioned.
As this article points out, he has a dark and sinister side, that reflects an inner weakness and instability, his attacks on conservatism, are always meant to endure, and to be used by the left. Paul loves to create anti-conservative sound bite for the left.
Never let an obsession go uncultivated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.