Posted on 06/02/2015 7:33:16 AM PDT by SJackson
Channel 2's interview with U.S. President Barack Obama, excerpts of which aired on Monday in the "Uvda" program (with the full interview to be broadcast on Tuesday), proves that the outlet continues to do the Left's bidding.
In the run-up to the March 17 election, Channel 2 was issued an emergency "call-up notice" to join the campaign to oust the Right. Judging from Monday's broadcast, Channel 2 has yet to get over the election results. It appears bent on casting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a negative light, while making it look as if he has picked a fight with Obama at the expense of Israel's future and security. That is false, grotesque, fabricated and biased. The channel is just trying to manipulate the public.
Israelis understand very well that as soon as Obama set foot in the White House, he reached out to Muslims, at the expense of Israel, and that he has continued to do so throughout his presidency, while trying to forge a dangerous agreement with Iran, once again, at Israel's expense. Obama is no anti-Semite or anti-Israeli; the main problem is with his court Jews, who tell him the Israeli Right is dangerous because it will not buckle under pressure, and it would be better to have a Left-run government that would operate according to the instructions of heroes such as media mogul Haim Saban and former President Shimon Peres.
Throughout the Diaspora years, there were Jews known as "court Jews." Kings, counts and others recruited these Jews to use them as their agents, helping them with financial matters and more than once as secret messengers on diplomatic missions. The court Jews would be loyal servants to their patrons, and professionals at currying favor with those in power. Because there was always a suspicion of dual loyalties -- to the Jewish community and to their masters -- the court Jews always had to prove their allegiance to their boss. After all, his wish was their command.
In the modern era, the term "court Jews" has been replaced by the term "advisers." Obama is surrounded by Jewish advisers. You can find them in the White House, the State Department, the media, in various NGOs and in various embassies. All of them have one thing in common: a liberal, left-wing worldview. Naturally, their loyalty rests with the United States. You can't blame them for that. After all, their salaries, their stature and their honor all derive from U.S. taxpayers.
These misguided individuals believe that Israelis are too primitive to think for themselves, that they are so underdeveloped that they cannot possibly know what is in their best interest. Like many others throughout history, these advisers want to save the Jews from themselves, but ignore one underlying fact: The many Jews who have decided to reside in Israel are extraordinary smart, and they are unwilling to buy the damaged goods Obama's advisers have to offer (notwithstanding the Israeli Left's sales pitch). Jews have returned home from the Diaspora mainly because they wanted to put an end to a long history of others making choices on their behalf.
The Obama advisers are mainly concerned about their employer's legacy. In the waning years of his presidency, it has become clear that he is one of the weakest presidents in the modern era. Under his watch, the U.S. has become a paper tiger aimlessly roaming the wilderness. The most powerful nation in the history of humankind now stands helpless. It has lost its resolve to take on fanatic terrorists who drive pick-up trucks fitted with machine guns. The Middle East has spiraled out of control; Europe has been unable to counter the spread of Islam; Ukraine is ablaze; but Obama? Well, he has been overly concerned with the oppressed Palestinians, going out of his way to show his compassion.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not been conducive to Obama's legacy. He has stood his ground, justifiably, like David facing Goliath. He has sounded the alarm everywhere, warning against the danger of a nuclear terrorist state. Any levelheaded individual listening to the voices in Tehran would have concluded long ago that the regime will never open its nuclear sites for inspection.
But Obama? He has continued his march of folly, the second such march in the 21st century (the first was several years ago, when he backed the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt). In the noise on the world stage, Obama and his advisers have resorted to using ear plugs, hoping this will solve the problem. Rather than deal with the challenges, they prefer to cast the Israelis as irrational human beings, who shoot from the hip. But this supposed rationality we are lacking has cost us dearly over the course of history.
The U.S. has opted for vengeance and retribution as a substitute for policy. Rather than show strength through leadership, the president has joined forces with Channel 2 to disparage an elected prime minister. Only the Americans are allowed to meddle in the affairs of other countries.
When Israelis cast their votes in the March 17 election, they spoke loud and clear: The Jews in Israel will not cower. As the Bible says, "The more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and grew" (Exodus 1:12).
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Am I the only one who doesn't think much of his non-Jewish advisors as well.
No. Obama is the problem.
Obama is no anti-Semite or anti-Israeli;
Really? Obastard is not an anti-semite or andti-Israeli? He demonstrates his hatred of Israel by his statements and actions. The idea that peace is possible with muslims is absurd. That Israel should collapse back to the pre-1967 borders is just plain anti-Israel. The concept of a "two state solution" is workable is delusional.
I wish these mediots would stop issuing statements such as those, when the evidence to the contrary is readily available for all to see
Axelrod? Dan Shapiro, Obama’s ambassador to Israel and one of his earliest advisor’s(2007)? Henry Kissinger, who praised Obama’s 2008 campaign promise to negotiate with Iran, without pre-conditions. Who else? SOROS!!!!!!!!!!
George Soros the german jew...born Gyrorgy Schwartz ..advisor and Bankroller Numner One to Baraq Mohammed Obama
I would not even agree with this rag’s claim that obama’s “Court jews” are pro-US.
Obola’s Jewish, Muslim, homosexual and atheist advisers - all equally of opinions and desires to those he holds himself - HATE the US only slightly less than they HATE Israel and the UK.
Make no mistake about it, it’s not the advisers....Obama despises Israel and longs for the day Israel is obliterated.
Dennis Ross worked for GHW Bush, Clinton, and Obama. Flournoy was Defense undersecretary for policy.
Obama set it up in 2009 with George Mitchell as his envoy to Israel and his mid-east team was Dan Shapiro, Dennis Ross, and Dan Shapiro. When Obama began his re-election campaign he got rid of Mitchell, whose job was to twist Bibi's arm, and appointed Shapiro to Ambassador. After Obama got re-elected he hired Kerry to twist Bibi's arm
Soros is a foreign policy Idealist. He is big on nation building and spreading democracy. He had a big role in the Orange and Velvet revolutions.
The “official” American Jewish Community is an embarrassment.
hes had major roles in all manner of affairs inclduing that silver crisis in Britain as I remember
Soros is no “nation builder” in any way.
He is a lying hypocrite who has destroyed SEVERAL national currencies of several nations in order to make his OWN profits by living and investing FROM behind the protections of friendly communist states.
Since the article was about foreign policy................
Soros was born and raised in Hungary.
Pardon me, the Hungarian Born “Jew” Gyorgy Schwartz
Schwartz being a common German name I made an assumption and ran with it.
I think many of them more like JINOS, and more Leftist and Progressive than their religious affiliation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.