Posted on 06/02/2015 3:50:21 AM PDT by markomalley
Hillary Clinton had trouble attracting high-powered women to a New York talk hosted by Silda Wall Spitzer two weeks before her campaign officially kicks off. Sources said that after ticket sales fizzled for an intimate $2,700-per-person, “just for women” meeting on Monday, the event was thrown open to men at the 11th hour, and the deadline extended to buy tickets.
The “Conversation With Hillary Clinton” event at Midtown law firm Akin Gump was originally aiming to attract 125 women. An e-mail invitation seen by Page Six said the event is “just for women.” But by Friday, “They’d only sold 50 tickets, so they threw it open to men,” a source said. “Ticket sales were supposed to close at 10 a.m. Sunday, but the hostesses were working the phones and pushed the deadline till Monday.”
We hear about 90 attendees included former Bill Clinton aide Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney and his husband Randy Florke, Maurice Tempelsman, Jill Braufman (wife of hedge funder Daniel Nir), Jean Shafiroff and Susan Cole. The event began at noon, but Clinton arrived at 1 p.m. in “a royal blue jacket and black pants.” She then took pictures with donors and delivered a half-hour speech before leaving at about 2 p.m.
(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
Yeah, but what kind of men? Transgenders, cross-dressers, and liberals?
This phrase might be a hint: “his husband Randy”
One who finds his/her Gonads in a “lockbox?”
Hmm....only $2700, a paltry amount for events such as these, and they could only find 50?
The beginning of the end for Hillary perhaps. This is evidence she’s beginning to be perceived as incapable of winning. Or more likely there’s a fear she will become an embarrassment to those who publicly back her.
The talk topic: "My Life with Elliot: A seminar on 'doormatting' by powerful men."
Hil could probably chime in with a couple of relevant episodes in her life with Bill!
Sean Maloney and his HUSBAND!!! OMG! FREAKS and PERVERTS.
This is the best the democraps can do?
They must not care about this election all that much
unless there is not going to be one...
Shouldn’t that be ‘alleged’ men?
If the event was billed as ‘just for men’ I’ll bet a lot more feminazis would have demanded to be included. HRC just needs to understand how to motivate her base.
That Hillary! was unable to attract 125 militant feminazi womyn in mid-town Manhatten does not bode well for her campaign.
Ashley Alexandra Dupre is a professional, and she keeps her promises to do the same thing to her clients that politicians do to the voters. She'll leave them smiling (although possibly with a lifetime disease) instead of snoring (and certainly with several generations of debt).
Event billed as “Conversation with Hillary Clinton” .....
The event began at noon, but Clinton arrived at 1 p.m. in “a royal blue jacket and black pants.” She then took pictures with donors and delivered a half-hour speech before leaving at about 2 p.m.
**********************************************
The Queen of Green (cash) in ‘royal’ blue no less, put in an appearance & that’s about it. Her “conversations” are similar to Obama’s “transparency” - nonexistent.
Even if everybody came, the gathering of New York women could still be characterized as a weak turnout
Pant suits sales were down. Who knew?
Toast
Slick is smiling.
Virtually her whole campaign is based on “vote for me because, like you, I have a vagina”.
If she can’t turn out women for a thing like this she’s toast.
My glasses are dirty, and for a second I thought you wrote "PIAPS" there at the end.
As you know, PIAPS is an acronym invented by a FReeper several years ago do describe Hillary.
It stands for "Pig In a Pantsuit".
“But unlike you, my vagina has cobwebs and is mostly used to store old furniture, and sometimes emails”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.