Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China is putting weapons on its artificial islands in the South China Sea
Business Insider ^ | 05/28/15 | John Garnaut, David Wroe

Posted on 05/28/2015 1:02:18 PM PDT by Enlightened1

Diplomatic tensions surrounding disputed territories in the South China Sea could escalate dramatically following reports China is now putting weapons on its artificial islands in the area.

Australia’s defence force is considering joining the U.S. in flying and sailing “freedom of navigation” missions over the disputed territory, where China has been building islands by dragging sand from a reef and piling it up to create structures now being monitored by satellites.

Fairfax Media reports the Australian fly-over expeditions may occur as a result of heightened concerns that China is enhancing its military capabilities and reach across the maritime expanse.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com.au ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: artificialislands; brunei; china; chinaarms; chinawar; islands; malaysia; mh370; military; philippines; sea; southchinasea; spratlyislands; vietnam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Enlightened1

I do admire the engineering. That was built in less than one year.


21 posted on 05/28/2015 1:18:03 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I bet the soldiers defending that little thing, are hoping that war won’t start.


22 posted on 05/28/2015 1:24:12 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Pretty serious development.

Poking around on Google Maps, I see there’s a LOT of islands around there. They could pull off a series of “nautical jurisdiction” claims, taking over what are barely considered islands, and (as noted) building artificial islands where convenient & needed to extend claims further. Then, of course, they’d militarily enforce their claims, taking over and/or shutting down much of the South China Sea.

Look for things to get very lively on the world stage in the next 6 months.
And the USA will, on the whole, just look on and gawk.


23 posted on 05/28/2015 1:27:20 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Hillary:polarizing/calculating/disingenuous/insincere/ambitious/inevitable/entitled/overconfident/se)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

...looks like a damn-fine hotel they’re building there...


24 posted on 05/28/2015 1:27:35 PM PDT by telstar12.5 (...always bring gunships to a gun fight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I bet the soldiers defending that little thing, are absolutely expecting war.


25 posted on 05/28/2015 1:28:10 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Hillary:polarizing/calculating/disingenuous/insincere/ambitious/inevitable/entitled/overconfident/se)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

A single Tomahawk cruise missile’s would do the job if needed.


26 posted on 05/28/2015 1:28:27 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

A nice typhoon would make some needed adjustments... Where’s Cheney’s weather machine when you need it...


27 posted on 05/28/2015 1:30:18 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Here is the article from yesterday in the daily mail
no subscription required:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3099565/China-weapons-new-artificial-islands-despite-army-previously-playing-controversial-construction-middle-sea-similar-building-road.html


28 posted on 05/28/2015 1:30:38 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th ("We The People" have met the enemy; and it is "We The People".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DB

Oh you mean HARP?


29 posted on 05/28/2015 1:36:09 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
I do admire the engineering. That was built in less than one year.

It takes us longer just for the environmental impact statements.

30 posted on 05/28/2015 1:39:29 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

Ok. Done. Who do I tell/sell this to? Certainly not going to post it here.

/not kidding


31 posted on 05/28/2015 1:41:39 PM PDT by piytar (Good will be called evil and Evil will be called good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Sure, a small tactical nuke 30 to 50 miles off the coast. Bye.


32 posted on 05/28/2015 1:46:54 PM PDT by Obadiah (This is Bravo-6, we have Zips in the wire! I repeat, Zips in the wire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Darteaus94025
Thanks China, for creating a target rich environment!

Actually, they did that whey they built the Three Gorges Dam.

33 posted on 05/28/2015 1:48:02 PM PDT by The Duke (Azealia Banks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: piytar

I think the only agency I’d want to deal with would be NASA-the others would just want to steal the deal, and NASA probably isn’t very happy with the powers that be right now-they might like to score something big...


34 posted on 05/28/2015 1:49:25 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Wouldn’t you have to get pretty close to the 50 miles to launch the thing from a sub?


35 posted on 05/28/2015 1:55:49 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Yes—close enough. From public news over quite a few years, several allies around that area of the Pacific have various kinds of defense systems.


36 posted on 05/28/2015 1:57:53 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob

“Well Darn,

I’ve been losing my weapons in lakes, ponds, rivers and streams.”

Gues where they all wound up?


37 posted on 05/28/2015 2:02:36 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liawatha, because we need to beat a real commie, not a criminal posing as one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

“Now some scientist here needs to devise a way to create a directional tsunami...”

My thought was a good storm will make those islands disappear. Real islands have substantial bases. These are sand bars. I’ve seen hurricanes remove or move entire islands. Hurricane Pass in Florida, for example.


38 posted on 05/28/2015 2:04:04 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

If you see the H-6 based there, it’s a clear indication of their intentions. That’s their anti-shipping cruise missile platform.


39 posted on 05/28/2015 2:12:39 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

A fleet of MSG-29s.


40 posted on 05/28/2015 2:13:51 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson