Posted on 05/28/2015 5:31:15 AM PDT by Rockitz
Columnist and author of “Adios, America” Ann Coulter argued current immigration policy is “100%” about trying to change the US ” into a direction that is more favorably disposed to vote for the Democrats” on Wednesday’s “Hannity” on the Fox News Channel.
Coulter began by praising Fusion anchor Jorge Ramos for debating her on his show and doing a “fantastic job” with the interview, something that she said no one else will do.
...
Coulter also stated that she thinks current immigration policy is “100%” about importing voters and said of Republicans who oppose closing the border, “They are looking at their short-term interests, they will win elections for the next five years and then it will be nothing but a Democratic country.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Seems Ann has been listening to Rush lately. He has been saying this for a long time now.
She’s only half right. The Ruling Class wants to dilute the votes of those who demand good government. That includes Republicans as well as Democrats.
Don’t forget one of the MOST important, fundamental differences between these immigrants and American workers: TRADITIONAL FAMILIES!
Good ole’ fashion nuclear families, where the father will work his butt off to make the money and the mother will take care of the kids!
Businesses do best in this environment, because the father worries about making the money and the mother worries about caring for the kids and USUALLY the home budget. Father’s mind is on his job, not the bleeding-heart, feel-good-ism, Liberal action of the day crap, etc...
Ann’s book will be the death of the Bush and Rubio campaigns.
They are the worst Dem Lite offenders. I wonder what Carly has to say about H1b in her tech industry.
Soon we will read of new college grads without jobs, its perfect timing for Ann to make speeches at campuses.
Ann has encapsulated it in a phrase that’s short enough for the low information voter to grasp. That’s critical.
But how can she be saying something correct and factual about the illegal alien invasion if she supported the wrong Republican candidate in the last presidential primary? She has to be wrong ... but the message still correct... somehow.
I'm not bothered by her past support of RINOs. If she were an actual candidate, it would bother me, but she's just a pundit. Her books usually sell well, so this one may open some eyes as to the reality of the illegal invasion.
It takes voters to destroy America.
JFK knew that Catholic voters had never voted republican, except possibly in 1956, as some sources think, while the Protestant vote had never gone democrat except in 1932, and 1936.
John F. Kennedy had a dream to replace the native American people with foreign voters, a different kind of voter, the importation of an endless supply of democrat voters.
“However, if there is one man who can take the most credit for the 1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported various refugee acts throughout the 1950s.
In 1958 he wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration reform after he became president in 1960. In the summer of 1963, Kennedy sent Congress a proposal calling for the elimination of the national origins quota system. He wanted immigrants admitted on the basis of family reunification and needed skills, without regard to national origin.
After his assassination in November, his brother Robert took up the cause of immigration reform, calling it JFK’s legacy. In the forward to a revised edition of A Nation of Immigrants, issued in 1964 to gain support for the new law, he wrote, “I know of no cause which President Kennedy championed more warmly than the improvement of our immigration policies.” Sold as a memorial to JFK, there was very little opposition to what became known as the Immigration Act of 1965.”
JFK and the democrat party were pushing chain immigration, generations ago.
Here is the Democratic Party Platform that JFK ran on in 1960:
Immigration:
We shall adjust our immigration, nationality and refugee policies to eliminate discrimination and to enable members of scattered families abroad to be united with relatives already in our midst.
The national-origins quota system of limiting immigration contradicts the rounding principles of this nation. It is inconsistent with our belief in the rights of man. This system was instituted after World War I as a policy of deliberate discrimination by a Republican Administration and Congress.
The revision of immigration and nationality laws we seek will implement our belief that enlightened immigration, naturalization and refugee policies and humane administration of them are important aspects of our foreign policy.
These laws will bring greater skills to our land, reunite families, permit the United States to meet its fair share of world programs of rescue and rehabilitation, and take advantage of immigration as an important factor in the growth of the American economy.
In this World Refugee Year it is our hope to achieve admission of our fair share of refugees. We will institute policies to alleviate suffering among the homeless wherever we are able to extend our aid.
We must remove the distinctions between native-born and naturalized citizens to assure full protection of our laws to all. There is no place in the United States for “second-class citizenship.”
The protections provided by due process, right of appeal, and statutes of limitation, can be extended to non-citizens without hampering the security of our nation.
We commend the Democratic Congress for the initial steps that have recently been taken toward liberalizing changes in immigration law. However, this should not be a piecemeal project and we are confident that a Democratic President in cooperation with Democratic Congresses will again implant a humanitarian and liberal spirit in our nation’s immigration and citizenship policies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.