Judges: Prepare for an IRS audit!
Bttt
Better chance in NO than with the supes.
Judicial watch needs to demand the identification and addresses of all those illegals Obama has let in to the country illegally (they had to sign up right?) so their deportation can be fast-tracked.
Like it will matter. Obama and the massive progressive-left US government bureaucracy will ultimately do what it wants.
What good will this do? Not a thing. The invasion continues on a daily basis.
Please appeal to the Supreme Court. I don’t think even as messed up as they are they could do less than strike this down hard.
Really curious as to the reasoning of the dissent. I wonder if it was an argument against the merits, or simply that no ‘lasting harm’ could come with lifting the stay.
Now for the enforcement!
does Obama really pay attention to these? Honestly it is good news
FOX NEWS should be on fire tonight!!!
Yes the dingbats are trying to figure out what's the fastest way to a corrupt judge.
Appealing En banc to the 5th circuit would likely have same results, and Scalia would deny it too before they could appeal it to another SCOTUS libjudge...a Moonbat.
Keep the clock running on Obama. ;-)
GOP will find a way to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.
Whether the courts find in his favor or against him; one way or the other does anyone think obama cares; he will drive on regardless, the courts have not stopped him yet nor has the congress he just takes another left turn running the courts and congress in circles.
This is another 17th Amendment (17A)-related issue. More on 17A shortly.
This is a reminder for patriots that, regardless of PC interpretations of the Constitution’s Uniform Rule of Naturalization Clause (1.8.4), interpretations used to justify federal immigration laws, the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate immigration.
Immigration is a 10th Amendment-protected state power issue. This is evidenced by the following excerpts from the writings of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, Madison generally regarded as the father of the Constitution.
From the writings of Thomas Jefferson …
“4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the — day of July, 1798, intituled “An Act concerning aliens,” which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force [emphasis added].” —Thomas Jefferson, Draft of the Kentucky Resolutions - October 1798.
Next, from the writings of James Madison …
"That the General Assembly doth particularly protest against the palpable and alarming infractions of the Constitution, in the two late cases of the "Alien and Sedition Acts" passed at the last session of Congress; the first of which exercises a power no where delegated to the federal government, ...…
… the General Assembly doth solemenly appeal to the like dispositions of the other states, in confidence that they will concur with this commonwealth in declaring, as it does hereby declare, that the acts aforesaid, are unconstitutional; and that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each, for co-operating with this state, in maintaining the Authorities, Rights, and Liberties, referred to the States respectively, or to the people [emphasis added]. ”— James Madison, Draft of the Virginia Resolutions - December 1798.
In fact, note that regardless that federal Democrats, RINOs, corrupt justices and indoctrinated attorneys will argue that if the Constitution doesn’t say that the feds can’t do something then they can do it, the Supreme Court has addressed that foolish idea too. Politically correct interpretations of the Constitution's Supremacy Clause (5.2) aside, the Court has clarified in broad terms that powers not delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate immigration in this case, are prohibited to the feds.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
So lawless Obama’s PC executive orders to regulate immigration are meaningless since the feds have no constitutional authority to make immigration laws in the first place.
And speaking of so-called federal immigration laws, such “laws” get us back to the 17th Amendment.
More specifically, the Founding States had not only established the federal Senate, but had given the power to vote for senators uniquely to state lawmakers. This is because the Founders had expected federal senators to protect their respective states by killing bills, such as constitutionally indefensible immigration bills, which steal 10th Amendment-protected state power to regulate immigration for example.
But as a consequence of the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, low-information voters go home after voting for their favorite federal senators and watch football, clueless to the major constitutional problem that their corrupt senators are helping the corrupt House to pass vote-winning immigration legislation without the constitutional authority to do so.
In fact, regardless if the Senate thinks that federal immigration laws are a good idea, the Senate wrongly ignores that the Constitution requires it to lead Congress to successfully propose an immigration amendment to the Constitution to the states before making federal immigration laws.
And to make matters worse, the corrupt Senate confirms activist justices who claim that the unconstitutional laws that the Senate helps the House to pass are constitutional.
What a racket!
The 17th Amendment needs to disappear, along with a bunch of corrupt senators and activist justices.
Sen. Mary Landrieu had recommended Higginson to Obama for the vacancy in November 2010.[5] The Senate confirmed Higginson’s nomination by a vote of 88–0 on October 31, 2011, and he was sworn into office on November 2, 2011. He fills the seat that had been held by Judge Jacques L. Wiener, Jr., who took senior status in 2010...”
Charles Krauthammer says this Ruling is a PROBLEM for Republicans. Can you guess “why” before reading the, very short, article below?
http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/05/26/charles-krauthammer-immigration-ruling-problem-republicans