I cancelled my subscription to Guns and Ammo after Metcalf’s column.
I resubscribed a month ago but still have not seen that article. Maybe I will get it Tuesday.
After more than 60 years of shooting, I believe that for whatever reason, double stack mags in 9mm are more reliable than single stack.
I would like to see the results.
“I believe that for whatever reason, double stack mags in 9mm are more reliable than single stack.”
Interesting. Would you have any conjecture why this might be? I can’t think of any, but then I am certainly no expert here. Your experience could be correct, but it would be interesting to understand why this might be. If it is true for 9mm, could the same reasoning be true for other calibers?