Present your “peer reviewed papers” and I will stop disagreeing.
That is all that I have asked.
I have never posted anything here that I cannot support with peer-reviewed references from the medical literature.
Your problem with me is not that I do not factually support what I post--it is that what I post does not support "woo"--that is, it doesn't support pseudoscience and snake oil. You are more than welcome to provide factual evidence, with peer-reviewed references, if you think I am wrong about something--but you have never done so.
P.S. If you think that I am going to post references to my own publications, you'd better rethink that. There is no way that I will put my personal information onto a public forum.