[Liz]

And as Trey Gowdy noted on Fox: When her factotums were deciding which emails were to be released, there was no one in there to make decisions based on the best interests of the American people.

Hillary's power-mongering inner circle made all of the decisions based on saving Hillary's corrupt ***... the game was to salvage her 2016 ambitions.

[alloysteel]

This was “prevent defense”. By carefully doctoring the flow of information, supposedly the lines of questioning that could prove VERY troublesome are never opened up. Circumstantial evidence, or even evidence that is a few years, or months, or even days old, is “old news” and therefore not subject to review.

There is such a thing as living too much in the moment. The past DOES inform the future. Not everything is determined by the “smoking gun”. Sometimes it is just piece by piece, one thread at a time, of detective work, and building a logical chain of events. People have gone to life sentences or execution for far less solid tested and unchallengeable scraps of evidence.

The preponderance of real DEMONSTRATED evidence is overwhelming, but there are still millions who have drunk the Kool-Aid. Nothing will shake their beliefs one iota.

O.J. Simpson is still innocent. Yeah, right. Jury nullification is a very potent force.

Would that they believed in Christianity so fervently.

[bert]

I keep in mind the fact that the e mails were released by the sender.

At some point there will be disastrous emails released by the receivers.

That’s what I believe.

One received e mail is more damaging than thousands of factotum cleansed sent e mails