Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

How soon before the US develops an “M2” main battle tank?


6 posted on 05/23/2015 4:20:22 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

Wondering the same thing, doubt it’ll even be discussed until the mid 2020’s though or 2030 even. I’d like to see them start work on a Minuteman IV already too. What we have are good, but old as all heck.


16 posted on 05/23/2015 6:29:10 AM PDT by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
How soon before the US develops an “M2” main battle tank?

If we do, under the present designation, it'd follow the M1, the early 105mm main gun Abrams, followed by the M1A1 with the German-designed 120mm smoothbore main gun, then the improved M1A1 and M1A1 SEP versions. So the more likely designation would probably be M1A3. And that would also avoid confusion with the M2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle.

Of course, it's also possible that a remotely operated or autonomous tank, as envisioned by the late Keith Laumer about three decades back, may come along, known as *BOLOS* in tanker-speak, officially Unmanned Ground Vehicles or UG-Vees.

They're already using converted M60 and M48 chassis, remotely operated, as mine clearance vehicles. And the Black Knight is another remotely operated/autonomous combat vehicle under study

22 posted on 05/27/2015 7:58:33 AM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson