The boy was not allowed to present evidence in his college hearing in the form of emails BEFORE the alleged rape where she was talking about their sexual encounters and anal intercourse.
The emails are part of the lawsuit as exhibits.
Could it be she was chasing him and felt rejected when he decided not to continue the relationship?
Of course it’s possible, even probable.
But is it possible at this point to establish “beyond a reasonable doubt” that a rape either did or did not occur?
Nope. Insufficient evidence to take a case to court is not proof of genuine innocence of the charge. Most “date rape” cases will of necessity remain forever in an ambiguous limbo.
What feminists want, obviously, is for female accusations of rape by a male to be considered automatically proven, or at least the standard of evidence necessary to convict reduced.
I don’t have any idea how many such cases result in conviction, but if some do it looks very much like men are being convicted on evidence that would not convict them for any other crime.