Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

Why should they be allowed to sue the manufacturer in the first place? Absent some very special unusual odd facts?? It sounds very much like a pure nuisance suit just trying to shake ( extort)!some money from a “deeper pocket” than maybe the proper defendant may have.


33 posted on 05/22/2015 2:38:50 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Of making many books there is no end, and much study wearies the body.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: faithhopecharity
It sounds very much like a pure nuisance suit just trying to shake ( extort)!some money from a “deeper pocket” than maybe the proper defendant may have.

I wonder if some Bloombergian donor has been backstopping this suit all along. That way, the parents can pretend to whine about the $250K with no actual risk to themselves, and they can be used to make the case for repealing "loser pays" laws nationally. The anti-2As have been itching to use this phony liability concept on gun-makers for years.

65 posted on 05/22/2015 3:12:08 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson