Ping
VDH ping ...
After living long enough to have witnessed the real Communism,
translating Communist communiques, interviewing and sharing
life lessons with first generation Ukrainian-Americans in high
school, and then later in life Ukrainian Christian refugees from
the USSR, looking at this liberal ideology, as I check the
rounds in my snubnose, NO THANKS.
Ultimately an epicurean culture evolves into a totalitarian society.
Two words that should not appear in the same sentence.
VDH BTTT
To think like a liberal, Jack Nicholson said it best...........“I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.”
If they keep gaining more power,
eventually they will live out their dream
of using the State to punish and exterminate
any who disagree with them.
At first glance I thought the title said...
Diversity hates nonconformity.
If progressive, socialist ideas are so wonderful, why do they have to be implemented at the point of a gun?
The beatings shall continue until morale improves.
We are supposed to be the shining light of the world. Champions of liberty and forces for good. Which all humans should and would be yearning.
(sigh) I just never thought I would see “it” here. The signs were there, the radicals from the 60s. The radicals are now mainstream.
LIBERALS ARE SOCIOECONOMIC FASCISTS!
a) “Leftists” pride themselves in being “their brother’s keeper”
b) Liberals ALSO expect OTHERS to be “their brother’s keeper”
c) Their “brother’s keeper” policies require that others are taxed and CONTROLLED in some way
d) Thus, unwittingly, Leftist policies result in THE USE OF FORCE. (If someone doesn’t pay taxes to fund their “brother’s keeper’s policies” someone will take them at gunpoint to jail).
As the saying goes: “Socialism: Policies so wonderful, you have to use FORCE to implement them!”
As one who cherishes individual rights, I object to the use of force on individuals. Left-wingers also claim to object to the use of force, but they don’t think deeply enough into the ramifications of their policies to realize they are huge proponents of the use of force on individuals to benefit the collective - sometimes in a very greedy manner. Hence the term “greedy liberals.”
That’s why I REFUSE to call them “liberals” because there is nothing “liberal” about their core philosophies. Liberal stems from the word, “liberty” and modern-day Leftists want the “COLLECTIVE” to have CONTROL over the INDIVIDUAL.
Hence, we need to start using the more appropriate term “Socioeconomic Fascists” for people who think they’re “liberals,” because they’re not liberal. They’re FASCISTS.