What this idiot fails to mention is that these white criminal gangs attacked each other.
If multiple black criminal gangs clashed, you can bet anyone in the area that is white would have been a target as well as members of the rival gangs.
That’s the difference these idiots don’t seem to understand every time they mention the 3 times that whites “rioted” in the past decade while downplaying the frequent flash mobs and riots by blacks that occur on a regular basis.
In practically every one of those black riots, there was one or more white people that were beaten up, robbed or killed. In every one of those “white” riots, like WTO in Seattle or the one in Denver...there were blacks in amongst the “rioters” and they were at no elevated personal risk due to their skin color. The inverse is never true. If there is a large group of black people intent on trouble, white people are at extreme peril.
And that in Waco, it’s looking like ALL the dead were killed by police, and that every single person present was arrested and is (AFAIK) each incarcerated pending a million-dollar bond. Police had arrive beforehand, in significant show of force, before anything bad was hinted at.
Treatment may arguably have been different, but in no way was “lenient”.
See my prior post just upthread. One of the gangs was not "white" in the gringo sense of the word — the Bandidos are either South American indians from Mexico and points south, or Americans of indian-hispanic origin.