Liberals believe it’s better to have no job at 15 bucks an hour than have have a job at 9 bucks and hour.
“Liberals believe it’s better to have no job at 15 bucks an hour than have have a job at 9 bucks and hour.”
As long as being on unemployment is a better deal than working, we will continue to pay and extend unemployment benefits. I have had ex-employees on the dole who told me so.
“Liberals believe it’s better to have no job at 15 bucks an hour than have have a job at 9 bucks and hour.”
But if you have no job at $15 an hour, you get 25K in welfare/assistance benefits.
I would like to know what is the legal basis for any of these laws - particularly on a local level. Anyone?