Your unjustified attack on monarchy betrays a distinctly non-Catholic view of moral theology. Monarchies have their place and add to the stability of societies where they are properly established. Any intelligent analysis of the last few centuries is informed by the knowledge that it is the destruction of monarchies that went hand-in-hand with the destruction of many stable European societies. On the other hand, leeches are leeches, and there is no place for leeches.
As to exterminating Mandy Crowe and her progeny “unto the third generation,” research (conducted right here in Baltimore) indicates that for the most part, it only needs to extend “unto the second generation.” Removal of the third generation to a different environment, and to other families, might spare them the same moral fate as the woman.
“She's probably never flown in a jet or had a piece of jewelry that cost over $50.”
No, she's spent it all on her collection of tattoos, the value of which apparently exceed some thousands of dollars. This human filth has spent more money on her ugly tattoos than any single piece of jewelry I have ever bought for my wife. You evince a belief that this slut is more deserving of adornment than my good, faithful, Catholic wife and mother. That's disgusting.
And spare me the marxist claptrap about how oppressed this person is, and how the Man wants to keep her down. She's “down” because she chooses to be down. Few people started life with less than my father and mother. My father was told he'd never amount to anything because of what he was (Italian) and who is father was (a not very good person, I will say no more). My mother's mother was carted away when she was seven, and otherwise grew up motherless.
My mother and father did not go on welfare. They did not think they were owed a living by those who called them “dago” and “wop.” When my father first went to night schools and was told “your kind of people don't get college degrees,” he didn't go whining and crying. They didn't go on the dole and cry out, “O, there are no opportunities for people like me!”
Rather than go on welfare, my parents worked any available job. At times, even while he was in night school, my father worked two or three jobs to support his family. Without thinking the government owed him a free check.
One of my earliest memories is attending my own father's college graduation. Please don't tell me about this slut's demonic sense of entitlement to loot the taxpayers to feed her own evil face. She should die. She is without justification. Her crimes are capital.
As I said before, there might be some small saving grace if she were to at least mouth the pieties of personal responsibility, if she did not flaunt her satanic behavior and beliefs, if she give some small acknowledgement that she doesn't deserve a damned thing she has, and she has lived her life waywardly. If she would at least offer herself as a warning of what not to become, the bad example by which others can learn the good. But this horrible pagan slut glories in its vomit, celebrates its depravity, and wishes to pass down its inheritance of devil worship. She chooses to be what she is, and that is evil. To rebuild the moral capital of society she should be eliminated.
sitetest
"You evince a belief that this slut is more deserving of adornment than my good, faithful, Catholic wife and mother. That's disgusting."
I never said that this slut (well-chosen word) was deserving of adornment, nor that your wife is not. I said, meant, and implied nothing of the kind. I was comparing Ms Cowie's bling to the Crown Jewels, neither of which are justly earned or justly awarded. I realize it's probably a mere misunderstanding rooted in wrath, but you owe me an apology for that one.
My parents were as poor as yours, my grandparents on the L. side conceivably poorer--- and you're right, they did not go on Welfare, which they judged was for those who were unable to work. They were among the Earth's true nobility. That is not the scenario I was talking about.
I was talking about a person right now whose living consists of public benefits, and who, if they accepted a job, would experience an immediate and precipitous loss of income and home. It's frankly unreasonable to expect a person to do this voluntarily.
It might be imposed on them by a just change in public policy, which I would approve.
But for a person to voluntarily walk away from a life of ease to take up a life of struggle and labor for themselves and their children, is something it is unreasonable to expect of anyone but the rare mystic/saint. The last time thins kind of thing happened on an appreciable scale was probably during the Crusades of the 14th century.
"To rebuild the moral capital of society she should be eliminated."
You're not even going to offer her the "re-education through labor" camp? Good old laodong gaizao? In principle, your "final solution" is less enlightened than that of Mao Zedong in 1949.
I understand you're probably talking through wrath. Would you like to try again, and come up with something like a way, a policy, a path for Mandy and her children to a just society?
Or is feeling angry about it, and wishing their prompt demise, enough?