"But you seem to support the idea that it is also “legal” to loot cost-free the rest of the society"
"Support the idea?" The fact of the matter is, tt IS legal to loot cost-free the rest of the idea. I don't "support" this policy. I oppose it. But the fact remains that it is not only not a capital crime, it is a legal form of behavior followed by everybody who accepts a government subsidy or benefit that they don't "need" --- including Social Security and Medicare, if it comes to that, as well as government schooling and Public Parks & Rec.
The UK government knows that they have put the whole weight of law in favor of degrading, lifelong, intergenerational, infantile irresponsible dependency on the part of what used to be the British Working Class (and we won't even mention the Royals.) They encourage it, they promote it, and they expand it, because they want it to be that way.
Mrs. Cash-cow is acting rationally in economic terms. The costs and benefits work out very much in her favor, because they were designed that way. She has responded to incentives as planned by those who control the policy.
Where the foundations of law are fundamentally unjust, positive law becomes less valuable. It may be appropriate to revert to something more primitive - a law of necessity, so to speak. Under such a law, I would say it's fair that if you loot, we shoot.
I live just a little south of Baltimore. The fiction of civilization is pretty much worn away. We are now paying the price for our indulgence of the vermin, such as the subject of this article. When we indulge welfare queens, such as this "lady," when we tolerate their sucking off our blood, we encourage the lawlessness that eventuates in Baltimore riots. The solution is to eliminate those who believe they are entitled to suck our blood.
It might be different if this “lady” at least mouthed the pieties of attempted personal responsibility. But this “lady” is an aggressive leech, operating within the bounds of what is “legal” only because she does not to personally exert violence to steal from the rest of us. Otherwise, she is no different from any of the other looters. If one were to legally obstruct her looting, there is little question that she would resort to less “legal” means. Shoot the looters.
That is what will be coming soon enough just a little north of me.
sitetest