Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

This is not a one-size-fits-all situation.

In some towns the local police can be lightly armed Peace Officers. But in places like Oakland, Baltimore, Chicago and New York they are outnumbered soldiers in a war zone.

This smells more like a standard Obama power grab - taking advantage of a crisis - than concern over the quality and suitability of local police departments.

Leftists like Obama and Hillary do not want power to reside anywhere other than the federal government.

First they dictated the size of our toilets, then came federal directives on the way our cars are built, then what we can do with mud puddles and ponds on our land, next was the strong arming of the school system, then federal control of our medical care, followed by forced homosexualization of the military, now comes the movement to intimidate, overpower and control local police forces.


7 posted on 05/18/2015 6:30:44 AM PDT by Iron Munro (We may be paranoid but that doesn't mean they aren't really after us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Iron Munro
Exactly!

And local police live, well, locally. A federal takeover, martial law, would need their cooperation. It won't do to have them able to defend where they live.

13 posted on 05/18/2015 6:35:09 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Iron Munro
I don't see anything here that prohibits local PD's from buying what they need, with their own tax revenue.

That's in every way the appropriate and Constitutional method.

22 posted on 05/18/2015 6:46:18 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon (I wish someone would tell me what "diddy wah diddy" means.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson