Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reverend Wright

Part of the problem is W did a horrible job of explaining the why, how, of Iraq. Which meant only one side was talking.


66 posted on 05/18/2015 7:57:05 PM PDT by Valin (I'm not completely worthless. I can be used as a bad example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Valin

“Part of the problem is W did a horrible job of explaining the why, how, of Iraq. Which meant only one side was talking.”

i agree, there were lots of good reasons to get rid of Saddam. wmd’s was only one of them. and saddam had used them in the past, and sure was acting like he had them.

and when saddam’s wmd finally did turn up, it was too late politically and the Bush admin just let it go.

one thing i do believe - ISIS will eventually get big enough that the US plus whatever allies, will have to re-invade Iraq.

it’s like the 1930’s: early on Hitler was seen as too weak to worry about, but by the late 1930’s he was judged too dangerous to confront.

and when the war started it was on his terms.


69 posted on 05/19/2015 2:41:13 PM PDT by Reverend Wright (UK election 2015: How sweet it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson