Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baltic countries to ask NATO for thousands of permanent troops
World Affairs Journal ^ | May 15, 2015

Posted on 05/16/2015 6:41:25 PM PDT by robowombat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Where they will come from is the most interesting question.
1 posted on 05/16/2015 6:41:25 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat

BTTT


2 posted on 05/16/2015 6:45:04 PM PDT by varon (Para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Obola will sent American troops and National Guard,
and replace them all with Islamic terrorists,
narcoterrorists, and criminal illegals
(at least the ones whom he does not make federal judges).


3 posted on 05/16/2015 6:48:22 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
the alliance has sought to balance the concerns of its eastern members with an agreement it struck with Russia in 1997, pledging not to permanently station "substantial combat forces" in those countries.

The NATO-Russia Founding Act of 1997

"John C. Kornblum, a former U.S. undersecretary of state for European affairs who helped draft and negotiate the act, spoke to the Journal about the NATO debate. Below is an edited transcript.

Q: Some NATO members are against the permanent stationing of troops in Eastern Europe, arguing that it would violate the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act. Are they right?

Mr. Kornblum: The first important thing is that this is not a treaty. It’s not something legal. An act is an agreement of political commitments people make. It’s not legally binding. The Germans are twisting that around by saying ‘We can’t violate the act.’ But there’s nothing to violate.

Q: If it’s not binding, what was the purpose of the act? Mr. Kornblum: The NATO Russia Founding Act was a statement by NATO and Russia as to how they were going to regulate relations. It was all done in terms of political commitments. It isn’t written in the terms of a legal commitment. It’s written as a political intention.

Q: In that case, it should be easy to cancel the agreement, correct?

Mr. Kornblum: It says if conditions change, all bets are off. There are all kinds of escape clauses if the other side isn’t sticking to its commitment. Clearly, the Russians have broken virtually all of theirs. There’s no way you can say the conditions are as harmonious as when it signed."

4 posted on 05/16/2015 6:52:26 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Where they will come from is the most interesting question.

So far the Rapid Reaction forces and the Spearhead forces are coming from a number of countries, it is NATO, a 28 nation alliance.

It is unlikely that we will again have 550,000 men in Europe like Reagan did, unless of course, we don't stand up to Russia and we allow them put the world under threat again.

5 posted on 05/16/2015 6:56:02 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Obammy can send some of his troops...




6 posted on 05/16/2015 6:58:00 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty ping.


7 posted on 05/16/2015 6:59:01 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
It is unlikely that we will again have 550,000 men in Europe like Reagan did, unless of course, we don't stand up to Russia and we allow them put the world under threat again.

What?

8 posted on 05/16/2015 6:59:41 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: norton

You have to tell me what you are questioning.


9 posted on 05/16/2015 7:01:28 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

will start (another) war with Russia (again)


10 posted on 05/16/2015 7:03:14 PM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

“Spades dance best from the hip”

“The music was new,

,Black polished chrome and came over the summer like liquid night”


11 posted on 05/16/2015 7:03:48 PM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Where will the treasure (and blood) come from that will be needed to entangle ourselves in centuries old European conflicts?


12 posted on 05/16/2015 7:04:36 PM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist

Let’s avoid that by standing up now to prevent Russia from putting the world under threat again, and presidents like Reagan having to keep a half million men there while we all wonder if each day will be our last, as we face the daily threat of WWIII and nuclear holocaust.


13 posted on 05/16/2015 7:09:57 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

There goes more US tax dollars.


14 posted on 05/16/2015 7:26:01 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were under Soviet rule from the end of World War II until the collapse of the USSR in 1991.”

They were also occupied briefly following the division of Poland in 1939 until the Nazis liberated them; they have reason to fear Russia.


15 posted on 05/16/2015 7:27:56 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Some people (American LEADERSHIP!) just want to watch the world burn...


16 posted on 05/16/2015 7:29:21 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

They are our NATO military allies now, Russia won’t be taking them.


17 posted on 05/16/2015 7:49:32 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

NATO isn’t quite all that.


18 posted on 05/16/2015 7:52:56 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Russia is no match for NATO, regardless of where your loyalties lie.


19 posted on 05/16/2015 7:54:15 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I agree with you although the West is asleep at the moment. Look at what’s happening in Eastern Ukraine.


20 posted on 05/16/2015 7:58:27 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson