To: thackney
Coal replaced by nukes I can see. Coal replaced by gas - not so much. One can use natural gas for transportation; you can’t use coal to fuel individual vehicles (unless you convert it to electricity through the power plants they’re shutting down).
5 posted on
05/16/2015 8:04:29 AM PDT by
Stosh
To: Stosh
Stationary power plants should use the lowest rank fuel available.
6 posted on
05/16/2015 8:21:11 AM PDT by
Eric in the Ozarks
("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
To: Stosh
"Coal replaced by gas - not so much." Not so much, but not BY much. Replacement of coal by natgas results in a significant reduction in CO2, as the mole percentage of hydrogen is much higher than in coal.
7 posted on
05/16/2015 9:33:26 AM PDT by
Wonder Warthog
(Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
To: Stosh
Dollars per kilowatt put on the grid, without taxpayer subsidies, is all that matters.
9 posted on
05/17/2015 10:28:38 AM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson