Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Coal replaced by nukes I can see. Coal replaced by gas - not so much. One can use natural gas for transportation; you can’t use coal to fuel individual vehicles (unless you convert it to electricity through the power plants they’re shutting down).


5 posted on 05/16/2015 8:04:29 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Stosh
Stationary power plants should use the lowest rank fuel available.
6 posted on 05/16/2015 8:21:11 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Stosh
"Coal replaced by gas - not so much."

Not so much, but not BY much. Replacement of coal by natgas results in a significant reduction in CO2, as the mole percentage of hydrogen is much higher than in coal.

7 posted on 05/16/2015 9:33:26 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Stosh

Dollars per kilowatt put on the grid, without taxpayer subsidies, is all that matters.


9 posted on 05/17/2015 10:28:38 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson