Click the pic to the full-text Free Republic thread.
Why limit it to two?
Read Men in Black by Mark Levin. Errors piled on misinterpretations followed by half truths and lies by the Federal Courts.
How Marxist...
Click the pic to the full-text Free Republic thread.
Wow, the Supreme Court has always batted a Thousand! >:(
Talk about the Branch of Government that is Completely antithetical to the founders intent.
Many think the state hasn’t had the right definition for centuries, for many more since the advent of civil no-fault divorce and remarriage. Now it’s ‘gay marriage.’ The state’s version of marriage in the modern era has always only been whatever judges, pols, or the voting majority happen to think it is at any one time. It doesn’t have any other way to define it. Pope Leo XIII warned about this 130 years ago.
Freegards
God created, defined, and instituted marriage.
They think they’re redefining it, but they’re not.
Because the Creator and Almighty Judge of the Universe has never changed His mind on the subject.
In fact, all they’re doing is destroying their own institutions, exalting injustice, undermining the moral basis to the claim to liberty in America, and leading the ignorant and naive down to hell with them.
If a court redefined “up” as “down,” and then jumped off an eighty-foot cliff, would the rocks at the bottom care about their immoral, illogical, unreasonable, unnatural, foolish definitions? I think not.
Not REdefined, but UNdefined.
That’s the secondary purpose of “gay marriage”.
The primary purpose is to criminalize Christian beliefs.
If you redefine “cat” to be “any furry four legged domestic animal”, then how do you describe an actual cat?
bump for later