Replies

Well, I think the 14 staples thing will be easy to verify.

Didn't say it wasn't. The head injury with memory loss is worked up with a Neuro Consult in the ER. Very simple test for overnight observation. Overnight observation was not indicated. The suturing of his head and leg was.

He remembers going into the curve and after, retrieving his cellphone to call 911. The accident was only a few seconds. Is that what he forgot?

He did remember to immediately lawyer up after the hospital visit.

You are very defensive here. Is there more to this you would like to tell us?

The NTSB reports the train was going 75mph in the 80mph zone and then sped up to 107 before the turn. The brakes were then manually applied immediately before the turn.

Not being defensive, just being open minded.

Kids dropping rocks from an overpass is highly possible and had just happened to a SEPTA train nearby minutes prior to the crash.

Sure the engineer is a lefty self proclaimed homo, but that in itself is no proof he intentionally caused the crash.

The windshield is cracked in just one place. Is that from a projectile(rock) or is that where the engineer hit his head as a result of the crash.

I don’t know for sure at this time

This is the first I have heard of the speed of the train being. Slower in the 80mph section. That adds a new variable to things.

It is entirely possible that he intended to crash the train. I just want to explore all the possibilities before jumping to any conclusions.

Do you think he crashed the train on purpose?