Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican

I “prefer to vote them down” because they are immoral and unconstitutional, and voting for them violates the first and most crucial sworn obligation of the oath of office.

The multitude of such bills from the “pro-life movement” have done nothing to stop abortion on demand. In fact, they have assured its continuation, since they surrender the only moral, constitutional, and legal arguments against abortion on demand.

Denial of the truth of what I’m saying is the only reason your “status quo ante” exists.

If we would simply demand that every officer of government keep their oath, and back that demand up with action, abortion on demand would stop in this country practically overnight.


98 posted on 05/17/2015 9:25:16 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

“back that demand up with action”

And what action have you successfully completed at the local level? ONE success is an example for others to follow.

And David Young must be unacceptable ... where was the success on behalf of Monte Shaw? who refused to participate on his behalf?


100 posted on 05/17/2015 9:40:00 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (-Connecticut Republicanism is a mental disorder. - Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson