Oh.
So post #31 is where you are citing somebody else's apologetic ... all minus giving not only proper attribution there...but any attribution.
Well, hey, then: Your absence of attribution in post #31 is enough to warrant the genesis of something on the negative side, if not derogatory.
So post #31 is where you are citing somebody else’s apologetic ... all minus giving not only proper attribution there...but any attribution.
...
Read the first line of #31.
If FR had a permanent ignore list you would be on it.