To: Responsibility2nd
The knife being legal or illegal is of no consequence to me. The fact is - He had a WEAPON. Why is the knife being legal or illegal of no consequence? If it was legal (and I'm not saying it was - it certainly looks like it was not), then who cares if he had a weapon?
To: Conscience of a Conservative
Question. Is having a weapon (even a legal knife) a violation of his parole/probation?
If not, why not?
21 posted on
05/06/2015 2:53:22 PM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility.)
To: Conscience of a Conservative
He was in violation of his conditions of parole by carrying a weapon. Plus, he was out on bond pending several active charges against him. He should have never been granted bond as he was obviously an habitual offender.
24 posted on
05/06/2015 2:55:21 PM PDT by
wrench
To: Conscience of a Conservative
Because he was a paroled felon.
25 posted on
05/06/2015 2:55:54 PM PDT by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
To: Conscience of a Conservative
Because he was a criminal, that’s why.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson