To: GIdget2004
Hillary vs. Hillary. Should be good. Will Candy Fatso moderate?
2 posted on
05/05/2015 9:59:06 AM PDT by
clintonh8r
(ISIS IS ISlam/Christian lives matter!)
To: GIdget2004
Nine debates is a lot. I’m not sure what you learn in the ninth debate that wasn’t obvious after four or six.
I hope the GOP will choose good moderators for the debates. We need republicans from the middle of the party moderating, not leftists from the media elite.
3 posted on
05/05/2015 10:00:01 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: GIdget2004
Hillary has spouted enough lies, so I suppose she can debate herself for many hours.
4 posted on
05/05/2015 10:00:11 AM PDT by
entropy12
(I hope senator Cruz is lot less abrasive and snide than some of his supporter FRiends.)
To: GIdget2004
So the appropriately nicknamed "Stupid Party" is going to make the same exact mistake it made last time and schedule way too many debates?
You could knock me over with a feather that they haven't learned anything.
5 posted on
05/05/2015 10:03:44 AM PDT by
jpl
("You cannot defeat an enemy you do not admit exists." - Lt. General Michael Flynn)
To: GIdget2004
A debate between Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Lincoln Chafee. Sponsored by:
6 posted on
05/05/2015 10:05:04 AM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: GIdget2004
I actually appreciate the idea of having many debates. I just hate that they are all so scripted & the same questions are asked over & over again. Most having to do with the economy. They are more like campaign commercials where everyone tries hard not to say anything controversial.
8 posted on
05/05/2015 10:07:51 AM PDT by
gdani
(No sacred cows)
To: GIdget2004
Hillary won't actually answer any questions more challenging than:
"How does it feel to be the second most wonderful woman who ever lived, right after Michelle Obama?"
9 posted on
05/05/2015 10:09:28 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(Oh, yeah. A voluntary internal aWe may be paranoid but that doesn't mean they aren't really after us)
To: GIdget2004
Hillary in front of a mirror? It’s a win-win....she can take both sides of an issue successfully!
11 posted on
05/05/2015 10:16:05 AM PDT by
Forty-Niner
(The barely bare berry bear formerly known as Arctos Horribilis.)
To: GIdget2004
Shouldn’t that be Dems plan 15 debates, nine of them for Republicans? Those so-called Republicans debates are moderated by Democrats, the media panelists are Democrats, and they’re sponsored by Democrats.
12 posted on
05/05/2015 10:20:17 AM PDT by
Dahoser
(Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
To: GIdget2004
” Democrats who participate in debates not sanctioned by the DNC will reportedly not be allowed to participate in later DNC events. “
“Democrats who participate in debates not sanctioned by SOROS will reportedly not be allowed to participate in later DNC events.”
Fixed it.
13 posted on
05/05/2015 10:20:41 AM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: GIdget2004
Dear GOP — do NOT have debates
DO NOT have debates.
15 posted on
05/05/2015 10:36:57 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: GIdget2004
Republicans should be planning to do without debates. They might be useful if there were two or no more than three candidates. A dozen candidates in a “debate” is absurd and distracting and serves to waste time and obfuscate message. It can help only the candidate favored by the moderator.
16 posted on
05/05/2015 11:06:56 AM PDT by
arthurus
(it's true!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson