“Can’t deal wit BOs voice.”
Obama’s voice is ok as is George W. Bush’s. The problem this empty vessel of a writer is missing is that you can tire of any voice particularly if you are a political junkie, hang on the president’s every word because you support or want to criticize him. [It is true what comes out of Obama’s mouth irritates me much more than what comes out of Bush’s mouth, but we are talking voices here.]
Bush and Obama wore thin on many people after 6ish years. The public was not so tired of either after 4 to not reelect them.
So, as the author asks and fails to answer, what is the issue of Hillary Clinton’s voice. Well a huge part of it is 1992. That is right, we started hearing her voice pretty frequently during the 1992 presidential election. That was 14 years ago. That was twice as long as it took many people to tire of the voice of Obama or G.W. Bush.
Imagine having the same boss or the same teacher for 14 years. You think you might tire of them? Heck the only way you can stand the voice of your parents, spouse and children for so long is that you better love them. Few love politician or candidates.
So Hillary Clinton’s friends in the media did not do her much of the favor they thought they were doing her by pushing her forward in the media for the last 14 years. We have naturally tired of her voice particularly those who do not like or are neutral about what she says.
Nixon was in a similar situation and he just went away from 1962 until 1968 making his voice somewhat fresh in 1968. Sarah Palin might be better positioned to attract votes this time around than Hillary because she too simply went away from public notice for the last several years.
I know time flies and math is hard but 1992 was 23 years ago not 14.
No. BOs voice is horrible. Uh ..Uh...blah blah blah, uh blah blah blah ...eh blah blah blah...ugh blah blah blah..aahblah blah blah...uh blah blah blah...uh blah blah blah ...eh blah blah blah...eh blah blah blah...eh blah blah blah...