Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IChing

I can’t see how this story would benefit the prosecution. Quite the contrary.


8 posted on 05/02/2015 11:13:27 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JimSEA

Try again. And refer to the comment just before yours.


12 posted on 05/02/2015 11:17:45 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: JimSEA
I can’t see how this story would benefit the prosecution. Quite the contrary.

It would only benefit the prosecution if it didn't get out. They probably thought they could keep a lid on this to run interference for avoiding a special investigator. At least long enough to get actual indictments out of a grand jury (they have 29 days now, I think).

Someone is feeding Conservative Treehouse this info. Could be some 3rd party trying to support the cops with disinformation, or it could be someone inside the Baltimore Police (or other part of the Baltimore criminal justice system) trying to support the cops by leaking legitimate info.

If the latter I don't see how this doesn't qualify as conspiracy by the State Attorney's staffer and her newsie partner. At the very least it would violate all sorts of ethical guidelines for both of them. It quite possible would be criminal. Then again, whoever leaked the information to begin with has committed potential criminal/ethical acts.
49 posted on 05/02/2015 12:08:24 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson