Replies

Lesson to the socialist, bipartisan political/regulator class: don't step in the deep end with vain attempts at amateur propaganda. Federal government, local government: same thing.

My local police and schools are currently governed better than how the federal government, governs things. If they weren't, I would either move to a different area, or I would stay and fight the corruption, and face a better chance of beating the corruption than if I had to fight the police and schools run at the federal government level.

My local and state taxes are too high. Since I haven't been able to change that, in a few years I will be moving to a different state and locality to try to resolve that problem.

If Obama and Sharpton had their way as this article states, they would take control of all government functions and make things worse. They want to federalize everything and that includes the police.

The opposite of that philosophy is what is represented in our Constitution . It limits federal government power and leaves government power to the states, and better yet, to the people. This idea is one of the basic principles that is defended on this website.

I don't think anybody here is saying that there isn't local government corruption and that we are guaranteed to beat corruption at all levels of government. If that's you think people are saying here, then you are setting up "amateur" strawman fallacy "propaganda".

The point is that to centralize government is not to make things overall, better. Overall it makes things worse.

When it comes to government centralization and federalization, are you on the side of the US Constitution or are you on the side of Obama and Rev. Sharpton??

Answer the question.

The point is that to centralize government is not to make things overall, better. Overall it makes things worse.

If you have a good king, it works, but what are the chances of that.

Point being there is no guarantee with any type of government with the nature of man being what it is.............

Try to rebut this with honesty. And while you're at it, answer to the state and local regulations and fees that stand against families building and producing. It's all done with the help of federal funding.

This is my country, and I earned it. Anyone who suggests moving from any part of it to suit a bunch of crooks recently descended from Europe has my blessing to stay, start talking to like-minded Americans and make their locales more American. Anyone who wants to continue local, yocal, European style corruption should get out of my country and go back to theirs.

For the nearly powerless position of president, show me a candidate who has a solid record of cutting government spending on bad education, bad policing and bad regulations instead of spewing hysterical speech about powerless, celebrity figureheads and conspiracy theories. Such a candidate for cutting spending might be someone like Walker.

Better yet, show me a political party without queer, feminist, government-linked business and other pathological activists messing up a president's cabinet. Don't issue hysteria instead of cleaning it up. Just the facts, Ma'am. Then maybe a candidate like Walker can have a little more say as president.