Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeganC
Let's be fair about this 'seat belt' thing. IT WAS COMMON PRACTICE NOT TO SECURE DETAINEES. As a matter of fact, securing them was NOT REQUIRED up until just a few days prior to the incident.
303 posted on 05/01/2015 10:38:01 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]


To: CivilWarBrewing

WRONG.

The general order in question dates back to September 18, 1997.

Here it is:

http://www.aele.org/law/2009all10/baltimore-transport.pdf

Relevant portions:

— Whenever an arrestee is transported in a police vehicle, ensure:
> That he/she has been searched and handcuffed, (hands cuffed in the rear), before being placed
in a prisoner transport vehicle or a “C. P.” truck.
> The arrestee is secured with seat/restraint belts provided. This procedure should be evaluated
on an individual basis so not to place oneself in any danger.
> That the seat/restraint belt is placed securely around the waist or upper body of the arrestee to
prevent the arrestee from maneuvering out of the restraint and possibly causing injury to them or
others.


324 posted on 05/01/2015 10:54:21 AM PDT by MeganC (You can ignore reality, but reality won't ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson