Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sotomayor: We’re not taking away your liberty, because we won’t force you to marry a gay person
LifeSiteNews ^ | 4/29/15 | Ben Johnson

Posted on 04/30/2015 8:55:52 AM PDT by BlatherNaut

One moment in the Supreme Court's oral arguments over same-sex “marriage” reveals what an embarrassment Sonia Sotomayor is as a justice.

John J. Bursch, who argued on behalf of marriage, said that the people, not five unelected justices, should be able to decide whether to redefine a pillar of society that predates the government and written history.

“This case isn't about how to define marriage,” he said. “It's about who gets to decide that question. Is it the people acting through the democratic process, or is it the federal courts? And we're asking you to affirm every individual's fundamental liberty interest in deciding the meaning of marriage.”

The “wise Latina” immediately interrupted him with the following non-sequitur:

“I'm sorry. Nobody is taking that [liberty] away from anybody. Every single individual in this society chooses, if they can, their sexual orientation, or who to marry or not marry. I suspect even with us giving gays rights to marry that there's some gay people who will choose not to.”

I'll pass over Sotomayor saying that “every single individual..chooses” his or her sexual preference. But don't miss the full illuminating brilliance of her argument: The Supreme Court is not trampling on the right of 50 million people in 35 states to settle their own law as long as straight people are not forced to “marry” homosexuals.

For Sotomayor, apparently anything short of judicially mandated sodomy is within the justices' constitutional prerogatives – a view that would surprise any of our nation's founding jurists, whether Jeffersonian or Hamiltonian.

(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; indiana; libertarians; marriage; medicalmarijuana; mikepence; rfra; samesex; scotus; soniasotomayor; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2015 8:55:53 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

The first and foremost tragedy of an adverse decision is that tens of millions of voters will be told that their vote is worth less than manure.


2 posted on 04/30/2015 8:57:39 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

That lesbo should recuse herself.


3 posted on 04/30/2015 8:59:06 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Civil rights are for civilized people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

But we will force you to bake a queer cake. Forget about “reserving the right to refuse service.”


4 posted on 04/30/2015 8:59:08 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
John J. Bursch, who argued on behalf of marriage, said that the people, not five unelected justices, should be able to decide whether to redefine a pillar of society that predates the government and written history.

So they should. But the unwise Latina has a different opinion.

5 posted on 04/30/2015 9:00:00 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Let us now try liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
All I want is ONE liberal to explain to me if two consenting adults can be married regardless of their gender, then why can't three consenting adults also be married?

Some liberal please ANSWER that and I will actually start listening to your arguments.

6 posted on 04/30/2015 9:00:40 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

Well, that’s a relief. Now we can go on to properly taxes on non conforming churches and/ or denominations.


7 posted on 04/30/2015 9:00:56 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: BlatherNaut

There is no way to fix stupid.


9 posted on 04/30/2015 9:01:30 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
The Supreme Court lite off the Civil War (But was by no means the only reason) with Dred Scott v. Sandford.

What has made people rely on them so much?

They gave us The Civil War, Segregation, Abortion.

What good have they done?

Ummmm...... Campaign Finance Reform.....yay(?)

10 posted on 04/30/2015 9:02:53 AM PDT by KC_Lion (This Millennial is for Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

[[One moment in the Supreme Court’s oral arguments over same-sex “marriage” reveals what an embarrassment Sonia Sotomayor is as a justice.]]

I was reading through the arguments last night, and she kept trying to interrupt kennedy, alito, and Roberts, but they just kept talking over her- and it dawned on me that the reason they were doing so was because she was asking ridiculous questions and interrupting the adults In the room who were trying to engage in a deep discussion about this issues-

It was painfully obvious she was out of her league trying to pretend she belonged-


11 posted on 04/30/2015 9:03:54 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

You would think if they wanted to pack the Court with Leftists, they would at least pick someone (Lawrence Tribe?) with an IQ higher than the temperature on a spring day in Maine. :)


12 posted on 04/30/2015 9:04:03 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Perhaps one could not be “forced” to marry a person of different sexual orientation, but there is still a serious degree of force involved, compelling individuals to do a great deal of compromising of their principles, under threat of severe penalties for non-compliance.

Ruin comes in many forms. This is like the days leading up to the French Revolution, in which every element of government had become so corrupt that it was not longer a legitimate representation of its subjects.


13 posted on 04/30/2015 9:04:54 AM PDT by alloysteel (It isn't science, it's law. Rational thought does not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Bingo.


14 posted on 04/30/2015 9:04:59 AM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

A mental midget who should never have been confirmed, and should be removed.


15 posted on 04/30/2015 9:05:11 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

...just perform the marriage, bake a cake for it, attend the wedding as a photographer, throw rice, and only approve of the whole proceeding.

Other than that, you’re fine.


16 posted on 04/30/2015 9:05:19 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
Please Pray This Week for Traditional Marriage – The Supreme Court Is in Session
17 posted on 04/30/2015 9:05:35 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

[[But we will force you to bake a queer cake. Forget about “reserving the right to refuse service.”]]

Exactly, and that should have been thrown in her face and said “You all promised that this would not happen and it IS happening- so obviously you all lied to us before- and now you’re telling us another obvious lie- EVERYONE knows damn well that we WILL be forced to marry them- and you know it too Sonja! Quit lying to us! We’re damn sick of it!


18 posted on 04/30/2015 9:06:08 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

You would think if they wanted to pack the Court with Leftists, they would at least pick someone (Lawrence Tribe?) with an IQ higher than the temperature on a spring day in Maine. :)

Is there such a person?


19 posted on 04/30/2015 9:06:09 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

Sotomayor: We’re not taking away your liberty, because we won’t force you to marry a gay person. Yet...


20 posted on 04/30/2015 9:06:40 AM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson