I don’t see a reason for optimism. Roberts apparently is buying the polls of the left wingers, which are nothing but “made as instructed” propaganda.
I hate to see ‘man’ playing God. I hope they come to their senses. Pray HARD, America.
Apples and oranges. The gaystapo will not be happy until they can FORCE everyone to publicly celebrate their perversion.
Christians will continue to lose all these little battles but we will win the war.
You do have to admit that it’s fascinating watch culture follow bible prophecy so closely.
Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy are both turning 80 years old next year. The next president will likely replace both of them.
If the next president is Hillary Clinton or Jeb Bush, then that will mean a liberal 6/3 Supreme Court majority will be legislating from the bench for the next 30 years. This is the most important issue of 2016 presidential election.
The Constitution says whatever 5 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices say it says. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
I ain’t holding my breath. I’ll be shocked if they uphold the bans and let the states decide.
Roberts will cave. Mark my words. He cares more about what others think of him than he does about doing the right thing.
Hey Roberts, how about if Sue loves Joe and Tom and Alice and Bob, and Fido, and Mary, and Bill, and Fluffy and her grandma? Can she marry all of them.
Supreme SODOMY...
Chief Justice Roberts is a good example why the 17th Amendment should never have been ratified. More on this shortly.
Roberts is wrongly ignoring that the states are basically free to discriminate against any issue, such such gay marriage, that they have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect.
With that in mind, consider that if the 17th Amendment had never been ratified then their would probably be all different faces on the Supreme Court today. The Court would probably be comprised of God-fearing justices who reflect the family values of the senators who confirmed them, senators likewise reflecting the family values of the state lawmakers who elected them. And if such was the case then patriots wouldn’t be concerned about activist justices trying to legislate so-called vote-winning “right” to gay marriage from the bench.
The 17th Amendment needs to disappear.
“More than any of the justices, Justice Sotomayor focused on what she identified as the basic question of whether the right to marriage is a fundamental right. If so, she said, it had to be extended to all citizens on equal terms.”
I would argue that marriage is not a right, much less a fundamental one. Except for gun ownership (which is a different argument altogether), since when must one “apply for” permission to exercise a fundamental right such as when applying for a marriage license? At best, marriage is a privilege, and not one that must necessarily be extended to all individuals.