Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Well, there was a time when everyone in FR supported Bush, and thought he was fighting for our country. There was even a time, during his first term in office, when he was thought to be conservative.

It did make a kind of sense to take on Iraq first before tackling the Saudis. Secure the oil first. But, as you say, that was evidently never Bush’s real intention.

I was also hoping that if we conquered Arabia, we could split the country in two: One country with the oil, the other with the Holy Cities. Leaving one of the richest countries in the world also basically in charge of Islam is not healthy for the rest of us.

But Bush proved to be a disappointment, as you say.


43 posted on 04/27/2015 7:58:40 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
If the U.S. had any interest in toppling the Saudis, the easiest way to do it would have been to simply let Saddam Hussein overrun the country.

That was never going to happen because this country never had a problem with radical Islam in the Middle East ... as long as those radical Muslims were investing heavily in U.S. political leaders.

45 posted on 04/27/2015 8:02:14 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson